Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Janga Vimalakar – Appellant
Versus
Rao Brothers Chit Funds Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of petition and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent's argument on the existence of alternative remedies. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on the need for reasons in decision-making and judicial accountability. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final determination supporting the need to appeal under section 70. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. conclusion regarding jurisdiction and order. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER :
B.R.Madhusudhan Rao, J.
1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the award and recovery certificate passed in AA/CF/No.422 of 2021 dated 20.11.2021 by the Deputy Registrar of Chits Warangal District at Hanamkonda.
2. Petitioners are opponent Nos.1 and 2 and respondent No.1 is the disputant in AA/CF/No.422 of 2021 and respondent No.2 is the Deputy Registrar of Chits.
3. It is stated in the cause title of the Civil Revision Petition that respondent Nos.3 to 5 are not necessary parties to the petition.
4.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the award and recovery certificate passed by the Deputy Registrar of Chits, Warangal is erroneous in Law and against the material availab
Judicial decisions must include clear reasoning to uphold transparency and justice, particularly in administrative and quasi-judicial matters, as supported by established legal principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
