Kilaru Suman vs Ketinani Bharathi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1721

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P.SAM KOSHY
Kilaru Suman – Appellant
Versus
Ketinani Bharathi – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MD SULTANA BASHA
For the Respondent: PILLIX LAW FIRM

Table of Content
1. common order for multiple petitions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitions for interim custody and visitation rights. (Para 3 , 4)
3. background of marriage and custody disputes. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
4. context of custody petitions filed. (Para 7 , 10)
5. petitioner's argument regarding custody. (Para 11 , 12)
6. respondent's arguments against custody change. (Para 13)
7. court's reasoning on child's welfare and maternal custody. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
8. visitation rights discussed. (Para 17)
9. conclusion: petitions dismissed. (Para 18 , 19)

ORDER :

1. Since the issue arising in the instant Civil Revision Petitions is one and the same and the parties thereto are also same, the two Civil Revision Petitions are being heard and disposed of by this Common Order.

2. Heard Mr.Md. Sultana Basha, learned counsel for the petitioner in both the Revisions and Mr. A. Raghuram, learned Counsel representing M/s.Pillix Law Firm, for the respondent in both the Revisions.

3. Civil Revision Petition No.2219 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 16.06.2025 in I.A.No.944 of 2023 in O.P.No.1837 of 2023 passed by the Judge, Principal Family Cou