Rupali Sharma vs Bharathi Reddy - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1731

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1731

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P.SAM KOSHY
Rupali Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Bharathi Reddy – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : BANKATLAL MANDHANI

Table of Content
1. overview of civil revision petition process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. critique of first appellate court's decision-making. (Para 5)
3. observations on proper judicial reasoning. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. importance of providing reasons in judicial decisions. (Para 11 , 12)
5. remand for proper consideration of c.m.a. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Bankatlal Mandani, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. The instant Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners assailing the order passed by the learned X Additional Chief Judge City Civil Courts, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Court’) in C.M.A. No.116 of 2023, decided on 24.04.2025.

3. Vide the impugned order; the First Appellate Court dismissed the aforesaid C.M.A. directed against the order and decree passed by the learned XX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’) in I.A.No.357 of 2020 in O.S.No.1513 of 2020, decided on 01.08.2023. I.A.No.357 of 2020 was a petition filed by the petitioners under XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for