SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1758

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.M.MOHIUDDIN
S.K.Reshma – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S MOHD ABDUL KAREEM KHAN

Table of Content
1. claim for compensation due to death in a road accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5)
2. court's observations on evidence presented and rationale for compensation. (Para 8 , 10 , 12)
3. the rationale for reconsidering quantum of compensation. (Para 14 , 19)
4. principles applied for award of consortium and overall compensation. (Para 20 , 21 , 24)
5. enhancement of compensation based on judicial reasoning. (Para 26)

JUDGMENT :

1. Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge at Karimnagar (hereinafter ‘‘Tribunal” for brevity) in M.V.O.P.No.474 of 2014 by the order and decree dated 09.07.2019, the petitioners have filed the present Appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

3. The brief facts of the case as can be seen from the record are that the petitioners have filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees twenty lakhs only) from the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 for the death of one “Shaik Mahmud Pasha” (hereinafter ‘deceased’ for brevity). Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the deceased, petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the daughters of the deceased and petitioner No.4 is the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top