Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.M.MOHIUDDIN, APARESH KUMAR SINGH
M. Rajeswar S/o. M. Narsaiah – Appellant
Versus
Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to retirement age based on birth date dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on procedural adherence for age assessment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reliance on past judgments for decision. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal summary regarding age determination rules. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT:
Heard Mr. G.Allabakash, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Anil Komireddy, learned counsel representing Mr. C.Raman Kumar Reddy, learned Additional Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries Company Limited appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 7.
2. The writ petition was filed with the following prayer:
“For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the impugned order Ref.No. MMR/SK/W15/2024/984 dated 28-3-2024 issued by the 7th respondent Ref.No. MMR/PER/L/062/24/4242 dated 19-9-2024 issued by the 5th respondent and Ref. No. MMR/SK/P.14/24/2180 dated 21-9-2024 issued by the 6th respondent intimating the petitioner’s due date of retirement date 31-5-2025 though the date of retirement on 30-6-2030 as per d
The absence of birth proof at the time of appointment justifies reliance on the age determined by the employer's medical officer, with no entitlement to change it near retirement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
