Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SARATH
Nettem Seetha Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. refusal basis on link document must align with statutory provisions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. compliance with g.o.ms.no.28 required for registration processing. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. authority to refuse registration based only on listed grounds is limited. (Para 7) |
| 4. court mandates registration of the sale deed under specific conditions. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent No.3 in refusing to process the registration and release the pending Sale Deed dated 06.08.2025 bearing Document No.P.732 of 2025 under Memo dated 14.08.2025 vide No.319 of 2025 in respect of plot admeasuring 500 Square Yards in Plot No.231-G/North Part, in Block-G, in Sy.No.364, situated at Tellapur Village & Municipality Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, is contrary to G.O.Ms.No.28, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (Plg.III) Department, dated 20.02.2025, issued by the Government of Telangana, as illegal and arbitrary.
“The Plots are part of Layout not duly approved by the competent authority such as GHMC, HMDA, DTCP, etc.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner fur
The registering authority cannot refuse registration based solely on questions of title; procedural compliance suffices.
Registering authorities cannot refuse registration of a document based solely on title issues if procedural compliance is met, as established by the Registration Act, 1908.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
