Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Pogadadabnda Revathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge on procedural grounds to police custody orders. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. comparison of trial court's dismissal against revisional court's order. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. review of legal basis for granting police custody. (Para 9 , 10 , 15) |
| 4. assessment of serious allegations and necessity for evidence recovery. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners to quash the order dated 26.09.2025 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Sessions Judge at Hyderabad.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the revisional court has passed an erroneous order setting aside the order passed by the trial court. He further submitted that the learned Magistrate has dismissed the petition filed by the State for seeking police custody of the petitioners and when the State has preferred revision before the Sessions Court, the same was allowed and the police custody of the petitioners herein was granted for three (3) days, which is against the legal principles. He further submitted that the FIR is registered in the month of March and police custody was granted in the month of October i.e. after seven months, wh
The court upheld the revisional court's order granting police custody for evidence seizure under specific legal provisions.
Police remand – When an accused is enlarged on bail, police custody cannot be granted so long as order of bail continues to operate.
Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty four hours - No power to extend period prescribed in Section 167 for completing investigation on any grounds, even in name of COVID-19 pande....
The Enforcement Directorate officers are not Police officers under CrPC, thus they cannot seek custody beyond the initial 24 hours of arrest unless substantively justified; however, compliance with P....
No exceptions can be made to the statutory provisions under Section 167 of the Cr.P.C., even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Police custody after the expiry of the initial 15 days is not permissible, a....
The court emphasized the necessity to preserve evidence relevant to a criminal case pending in lower courts.
The refusal to accept the notice under Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code implies non-cooperation in the investigation and justifies the arrest. Preserving evidence is crucial in criminal cas....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
