SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1922

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
K. Prestigious Lounge – Appellant 
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent 
Writ Petition No.20068 of 2024
Decided On : 14-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : HABEEB ABUBAKAR ALHAMED
For the Respondent: GP FOR HOME

Compliance with tobacco regulation laws is essential for operating hookah businesses, which must adhere to licensing requirements to ensure public health and safety.

Headnote:(A) Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce) Act, 2003 - Sections 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 13 - The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus against the respondents’ interference in their business of serving flavoured hookahs, claiming all necessary permits for operation - The court examined the relevant sections prohibiting smoking in public places and the requirements for labeling tobacco products. (Paras 2-14)

(B) Licensing and Permissions - The court stated that the petitioner must follow statutory requirements for running the hookah business and obtain necessary licenses, emphasizing the need for compliance with health and safety regulations. (Paras 15-16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner operates a coffee shop, K. Prestigious Lounge, which was restricted by authorities from serving flavored hookahs, despite obtaining the necessary permissions and licenses.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the petitioner to file representations with respondent authorities regarding the service of flavored hookahs, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements.

Issues: The key questions included the legality of the petitioner's business operation as per the COTP Act and the authority of the respondents to restrict such services.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the importance of complying with statutory provisions regarding tobacco regulation and the necessity for obtaining appropriate licenses.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek permissions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for business legality. (Para 2 , 3)
2. prohibitions and regulations regarding tobacco products. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 13)
3. authority's powers and provisions related to enforcement. (Para 7 , 8 , 12)
4. court's directive on representation and compliance. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

ORDER :

N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6. With their consent this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:-

“…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent Nos.3 and 4 herein interfering with the said business of the petitioner running under the name and style as “K. Prestigious Lounge, Hookah and Cafe” situated at D.No.18-2- 43/A/1, G.M.Colony, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred as ‘coffee shop’) in serving of flavoured Hookahs as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of COTP Act and consequently, direct the respondents not to interfere into the business activities of the petitioner coffee shop...”

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner claims to be Proprietor of the coffee shop. It is submitted that the petitioner has obtained all necessary permissions from various authorities to run its business. The petitioner has applied for provisional trade license from GHMC. The respondent authorities are restricting the petitioner from serving flavoured hookahs in the said Coffee Shop. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed.

4. On a perusal of the COTP Act, 2003, Sub-clauses (b), (k) and (n) of Section 3: Definitions, reads as under:

“(b) cigarette includes,--

(i) any roll of tobacco wrapped in paper or in any other substance not containing tobacco,

(ii) any roll of tobacco wrapped in any substance containing tobacco, which, by reason of its appearance, the type of tobacco used in the filter, or its packaging and labelling is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as cigarette, but does not include beedi, cheroot and cigar;

(k) production, with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, includes the making of cigarettes, cigars, cheroots, beedis, cigarette tobacco, pipe tobacco, hookah tobacco, chewing tobacco, pan masala or any chewing material having tobacco as one of its ingredients (by whatever name called) or snuff and shall include--

(i) packing, labelling or re-labelling, of containers;

(ii) re-packing from bulk packages to retail packages; and

(iii) the adoption of any other method to render the tobacco product marketable;

(n) smoking, means smoking of tobacco in any form whether in the form of cigarette, cigar, beedis or otherwise with the aid of a pipe, wrapper or any other instruments;”

5. Section 4 of the Act stipulates prohibition of smoking in a public place. As per the State Amendment of Gujarat, Section 4A has been inserted which is extracted hereunder for reference:

“Prohibition of hookah bar.--4A. Not with standing anything contained in this Act, no person shall, either on his own or on behalf of any other person, open or run any hookah bar in any place including the eating house.

Explanation.-- The term eating house shall have the same meaning as assigned to it by clause (5A) of section 2 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951 (Bom. XXII of 1951).”

6. Similarly the State of Maharashtra also inserted Section 4A as was inserted by State of Gujarat.

7. This Court has taken note of the above amendments carried out by other States in their respective statutes on the subject which may serve as useful guide.

8. Section 6 of the Act refers to prohibition on sale of cigarette or other tobacco products to persons below the age of 18 years and in particular area.

9. Section 7 of the Act stipulates Restrictions on trade and comm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top