Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to the Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplied – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Sura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details regarding seizure and tests of rice (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. contentions from both appellant and respondents (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis of jurisdiction and statutory process (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's final determination on the impugned order (Para 17) |
| 5. conclusion and directions for proceeding (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT :
This Writ Appeal assails the order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.32351 of 2025, whereby the learned Single Judge directed the appellants to release the seized stock of rice (54.15 quintals), vehicle (TS 19 T 8902) and cell phones, on the ground that the seized rice was not found to be Public Distribution System (PDS) rice.
2. Heard Sri N.S.Arjun Kumar, learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the appellants, Sri K.Venu Madhav, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Majesh Raju, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent No.3 and perused the record.
Factual Matrix in brief:
3. On 09.09.2025, acting upon credible information, the Enforcement Officials of the Civil Supplies Department conducted an inspection of the premises of M/s Sri Vasavi Moder
The exercise of writ jurisdiction is inappropriate when statutory proceedings are pending, particularly in cases involving conflicting evidence and public interest.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
