IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T.MADHAVI DEVI, J.
Sujanashri Gavirneni and others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.36845 of 2017, Writ Petition No.28496 of 2021 And Writ Petition No.33938 of 2024
Decided On : 27-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. historical ownership and auction details (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. commissioner's orders and partition suit outcomes (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. challenging prohibition on registration claim (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. subsequent petitioners' claims and issues (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's requirement for valid recognition of waqf lands (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 6. court's final ruling on invalidity of notification (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. judgment outcome and closure (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
T.MADHAVI DEVI, J.
W.P.No.36845 of 2017 has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring letter No.3/WPO/KIZ/2011 dt.31.10.2011 and letter No.M1/54/RR/Prot/84-Supply-1 dt.10.12.2013 of respondent No.7 and Muntakhab No.54/M1/Tel-I/RR/84 dt.27.03.2004 published in A.P. Gazette No.22 dt.27.05.2004 at page No.599, as illegal and as contrary to Section 22A of the Registration Act, 1908 and consequently to set aside the same and suspend the proceedings to the extent it concerns the lands/plots of the petitioners in Survey No.66/1 situated at Trimulgherry Village, Secunderabad, Hyderabad District and to pass such other order or orders.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of W.P.No.36845 of 2017 are that the land in Survey No.62 of Trimulgherry Village was in the name of Koh-e-Imam Zamin from 1330 Fasli (1920 AD) up to 1339 Fasli (1929 AD) as per the correspondence available in Tahsil’s File No.40/11 of 1343 Fasli. In 1339 Fasli corresponding to 1929 AD, the land was resumed by the Government from Koh-e-Imam Zamin and it was in the possession of the Government. In 1351 Fasli, i.e., 1941 AD, the Collector, Aatraf Balda District addressed the Letter No.1129 to the Tahsildar North that the land should be auctioned under Laoni rules and accordingly, auction proposals were submitted for his confirmation. It is stated that a notification for auction of this land falling in Survey No.62 of Trimulgherry was issued and auction was conducted and one Sri Kalika Prasad became the auction purchaser for Rs.250/- and the auction was confirmed by the Collector vide his letter No.341 dt.04.03.1352 Fasli, i.e., 1942 AD and the possession of land admeasuring Ac.5.08 guntas was also delivered to Sri Kalika Prasad as per the letter of Moulvi Syed Mustafa Ali Khan, Collector of Hyderabad District addressed to the Tahsildar North and by letter No.1642 dated 29 Maher, 1352 Fasli, the Tahsildar informed the Maqdam Patwari of Trimulgherry Village that higher office of District through Letter No.341 dated 04 Bahman 1352 Fasli, the land has been finally auctioned through the three times auction in the name of Mr. Kalika Prasad for a sum of Rs.250/- and that the auction bidder had deposited the said amount in the treasury of the District at the Ledger Folio No.154 dated 2nd Bahman, 1352 Fasli and that the possession of the land be delivered to the purchaser and accordingly, in Jamabandi of 1352 Fasli, the alienation of the patta be caused in the name of the purchaser and the proceedings be submitted at the time of Jamabandi. However, without reference to the above documents, on 18.01.1951, Muntakhab No.13 of 1951 was issued in respect of the land falling in Survey No.62 (old) new Survey No.66/1 by the Commissioner of Atiyat. It is stated that no notice and no opportunity was given to Sri Kalika Prasad who was already in the possession of the property as pattadar much before the proceedings of the Commissioner of Atiyat dt.18.01.1951. It is stated that at Column No.8 of Muntakhab No.13 of 1951, it is mentioned that by order dt.12.12.1950 of the Additional Collector of Hyderabad District, the Inam land was restored in the name of Chilla Hazrat Imam Zamin Ali Moosa Raza Ale Salaam perpetually and that Syed Ali Zaidi has been appointed and sanctioned the performance of service. It is stated that the alleged proceedings dt.12.12.1950 of the Additional Collector restoring the land back to the Dargah are not available and further that neither the auction that was conducted nor the confirmation nor the handing over of posses
B. Gowra Reddy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department
Notifications claiming property as Waqf land are invalid without proper survey and notice to concerned parties, emphasizing due process under the Waqf Act.
The court ruled that the notification declaring lands as waqf property was invalid due to procedural lapses and lack of evidence, affirming the petitioners' ownership rights.
The court ruled that proper inquiry and adherence to statutory procedures are essential for valid Waqf declarations, invalidating the notification in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the dismissal of the Writ Petition challenging the Gazette Notification, with the court granting the petitioner liberty to raise objections before ....
The Gazette Notification No.6-A dated 09.02.1989 was declared invalid for non-compliance with the Wakf Act, 1954, allowing petitioners to register their properties.
(1) Creation of Wakf – Alleged use of suit land as burial ground prior to 1900 or 1867 is not sufficient to establish a Wakf by user in absence of evidence to show that it was so used.(2) Principle o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.