IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Sana Nitish Kumar Reddy, S/o S. Diwakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kalimela Tarja Priyanka, w/o Sana Nitish Kumar Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NBK, J.
This appeal is filed against the Order and Decree dated 08.08.2023 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Malkajgiri, in F.C.O.P. No. 150 of 2019. By the impugned order, the Family Court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner (i.e., the husband) is not entitled to the grant of divorce on the ground of cruelty, as the allegations were not proved.The appellant herein is the husband, and the respondent is the wife.
2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:
The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 18.05.2015 at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, in accordance with Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage, the parties cohabited at the matrimonial home and lived together for a period of time, though disputes arose subsequently. The respondent is employed in the private sector, and the petitioner is also employed, with both parties maintaining independent work schedules. In August 2017, the respondent conceived, and unfortunately, the pregnancy ended in miscarriage/abortion after medical intervention at Rainbow Hospital, L.B. Nagar. Thereafter, the parties continued to live s
Jaspal Kour Cheema vs Industrial Trade Links
Joydeep Majumdar vs Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar
Pruthviraj Sinh Nodhubha vs Jayesh Kumar Chhakadas Shah
Bandhu Mahto (Died) by LRs vs BhukhilMahatain
The allegation of cruelty must be substantiated with persistent and severe behavior affecting marital life; normal marital disputes do not meet this threshold.
The court found that general allegations of cruelty without specific evidence do not justify the dissolution of marriage, emphasizing the need for substantial proof of mental or physical cruelty.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the concept of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the consideration of irretrievable b....
Divorce—Cohabitation between husband and wife is one of essential part of a marriage and not submitting by either spouse for relationship may be one of grounds of treating other spouse with cruelty—D....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the proof of cruelty and desertion under Section 13 (1) (ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Persistent pressure from a spouse to separate from family constitutes mental cruelty justifying divorce.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.