Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Ellandula Praneeth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department – Respondent
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:
“…to declare the impugned proceedings No.G1/4/CC/2014, dated 26.02.2015 issued by the respondent No.2 for revocation of building permission granted in favour of the petitioner vide proceedings No.44/2013-14, dated 07.12.2014 without any competent orders for title pending civil suit i.e. I.A.No.18 of 2015 in O.S. No.5 of 2015 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District, having injunction order in favour of the petitioner’s property to an extent of 241.11 sq. yards or 201.56 sq. meters, in Sy. No.2367/B, situated at Huzurabad village and Mandal, Karimnagar District is illegal, arbitrary, against to the principles of natural justice and set aside the same and to pass...”
2. Heard Sri K.Buchi Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and Sri R.K.Suri, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and 4.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the open plot admeasuring 241.11 Sq. Yards in Survey No.2367/B, situated at Huzurabad Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District (herein after ‘s
The revocation of building permission must consider the principle of natural justice, particularly in context of ongoing civil suits regarding property title.
A petitioner must establish ownership and prove claims regarding land disputes to secure injunctive relief against construction, particularly when prior judicial outcomes are unfavorable.
Authorities are bound by survey reports in property disputes, and arbitrary rejection of building permission violates procedural fairness.
Point of law: There is a presumption that public officials would discharge their duties honestly and in accordance with law. Even administrative power to be exercised to fulfill real purpose and not ....
The respondent No. 2 cannot take shelter under the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 69/2001. The building permission granted without considering the objections was bad, arbitrary, and against t....
Building permission must be obtained with full disclosure of all relevant facts, including pending litigation; failure to do so constitutes misrepresentation under Section 450 of the GHMC Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
