SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 2121

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ, G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J.
Aurobindo Pharma Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 2391, 2404, 2411, 2412, 2418, 2438, 2439, 2442, 2445, 2446 of 2023, Writ Petition Nos. 24133, 24244, 24500, 24578, 35222, 35228, 35470, 35895, 36000, 36077, 36078, 36130, 36186, 37285 of 2025
Decided On : 10-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kailash Nath P S S
For the Respondent: GP For Commercial Tax

The court established that exports classified as zero-rated supplies are eligible for refunds of input cess, reinforcing the principles of GST applicability.

Headnote:(A) Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 54(3) - Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 - Sections 8 and 11(2) - Appeals for refund of tax against zero-rated supplies - Claim for refund by the appellant was rejected based on applicability of cess on non-taxable supplies. The Court reiterated that exports, which are categorized as zero-rated supplies, are eligible for a refund of input cess if the final product is exempt from the levy of tax. The Court refers to two precedents which clarify the law and directs the lower authority to reconsider the refund claims. (Paras 9-11)

(B) Appellate authority's role - A higher authority should not deny claims without proper justification, especially where legal precedents support the appellant's position. (Para 10)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, engaged in pharmaceuticals, claimed refunds for cess paid on inputs related to exported goods, which were deemed non-taxable under the Cess Act. The claim was initially rejected based on the interpretation of applicable laws.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that previous judgments established the eligibility for refunds on zero-rated exports when the final products are exempt from the cess levy.

Issues: The core issues were whether the claim for refund was maintainable and the applicability of cess on non-tax supplies.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that since the appellant's exports qualify as zero-rated supplies, the refusal to grant a refund was improper. The matter was remanded for reconsideration.

Result: Writ Petitions disposed of; impugned orders set aside and the matter remanded.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks refund of cess on zero-rated supplies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's arguments for refund eligibility. (Para 5 , 8)
3. counter-affidavit supports the impugned orders. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court references relevant precedents for decision-making. (Para 9 , 10)
5. court remands matter for fresh decision. (Para 11)

ORDER :

1. Sri Kailash Nath P.S.S. learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax appears for respondents.

2. Writ Petition No.2391 of 2023 along with analogous Writ Petitions has been filed on behalf of the same petitioner.

3. The claim for refund of tax paid against zero rated supplies for different periods has been rejected by respondent No.2 vide impugned orders dated 04.05.2021 in W.P. Nos. 2391, 2404, 2411, 2412, 2418, 2438, 2439, 2442, 2445 and 2446 of 2023; dated 28.10.2024 in W.P. Nos.24133, 35895, 36000, 36077, 36130, 36186 and 37285 of 2025; dated 31.08.2024 in W.P. Nos.24224, 24500, 24578, 35222, 35228, 35470 and 36078 of 2025 which have been confirmed in appeals by respondent No.3 vide impugned orders dated 19.08.2022 in W.P. Nos. 2391, 2404, 2411, 2412, 2418, 2438, 2439, 2442, 2445 and 2446 of 2023; dated 07.05.2025 in W.P. Nos.24133, 24224, 24500, 24578, 35222, 35228, 35470, 35895, 36000, 36077, 36078, 36130, 36186 and 37285 of 2025. The relevant details in respect of which the petitioner filed individual Writ Petitions indicating the tax period, the amount of refund claim, the date of Order-In-Original and the date of Order-In-Appeal are furnished in the form of tabulation chart hereunder:

4. The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of pharmaceutical products. It primarily undertakes supplies to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units and exports also. It is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘GST Act’). According to the petitioner, under the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 (for short ‘Cess Act’), a cess is levied under Section 8 of the Cess Act on intra-State or inter-State supplies of such goods or services as specified in column (2) of Schedule to the Cess Act for the purposes of providing compensation to the States for the loss of revenue for a period of five years from the date on which the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’), was brought into force. The Cess Act provides for manner of determining the shortfall in revenue for the States and the methodology for calculation and release of compensation. In terms of Section 11 (2) of the Cess Act, the provisions of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘IGST Act’) and the Rules made thereunder apply mutatis mutandis to the levy and collection of cess on inter-State supplies of goods or services. The proviso thereto states that the cess on supply of goods or services shall be utilized only towards payment of cess on supply of goods or services leviable under this Section as such the cess paid on inputs can be utilized only for claiming credit for cess on supplies payable, if any, and not as a credit for any other tax including CGST or IGST. Section 9 of the Cess Act provides for furnishing of returns in respect of taxable supply of goods or services or both upon payment of cess in forms prescribed. It also provides for application for refund of such cess in such form as may be prescribed. In terms of Sections 9 and 11 of the Cess Act read with Section 16 of the IGST Act, direct export of goods and supplies made to SEZ units would qualify to be zero rated supplies under the Cess Act also. Therefore, the provisions relating to zero rated supplies would apply to export of goods and supplies made to SEZ units under the Cess Act also. As per the petitioner, in terms of (3) of the IGST Act, a person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim refund of cess in accordance with Section 54 of the CGST Act subject to fulfilment of conditions as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top