Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
J. Shiva Shankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri S.Gopal Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner approached this Court seeking the prayer as under:
“…to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing G.O.Rt.No.38, Revenue (Vigilance-I) Department, dt.1-2- 2021, imposing a penalty of 10% cut-in-pension for a period of 3 years against the petitioner and set aside the same, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 16 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to accord notional promotion in the category of Deputy Collector and Special Grade Deputy Collector with effect from a due date and further fix his pensionary benefits based on such notional promotion by applying pay scales as revised from time to time by regulating various spells of period as on duty by passing orders by the 1st respondent on the proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing CCLA's Lr.No.Ser.III(1)/314/2018, dt. 29-02-2020 and direct the respondents t
Prolonged disciplinary proceedings against retired employees without justification can lead to quashing of the proceedings, emphasizing the need for timely action.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
