Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, PRASHANT KUMAR, JJ
Kaushal Kishore and another – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue , Lucknow and 4 others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. illegal occupation of private property without compensation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims and grievances regarding land construction without legal procedures. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. petitioners' rights to due compensation under relevant law. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. state's obligation to follow legal procedure for land acquisition. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. final ruling stating legal processes must be followed for compensation. (Para 20 , 21) |
(Delivered by Hon’ble Prashant Kumar, J.)
1. Heard Sri Madan Gopal Tripathi and Sri Shivam Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Chaturvedi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State respondent nos.1 to 4.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer:-
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to pay promptly a due compensation to the petitioners for the land admeasuring area 0.109 hectare out of Gata No. 328 admeasuring total area 1.025 hectare situated in village
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
