Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Jagdish Sahai, Bishambhar Dayal, JJ
Kalyan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim relief applications are not executable orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. question of jurisdiction for interim relief under specific provisions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. scope of judicial power under rules governing appeals. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. previous decisions inform the interpretation of interim relief provisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. conditions and provisions under which relief can be granted. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. need for interim protection of subject matter of appeal. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. judicial discretion in granting interim measures related to appeals. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. understanding the powers available under specific court rules. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 9. clarification on the nature of 'subject matter' regarding appeals. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 10. conclusion on the inapplicability of interim relief in this case. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
1. I had the advantage of reading the judgment of my brother Jagdish Sahai and I agree with him that the question should be answered In the negative and that the petitioner should pay costs of the respondents. Or. 45, R. 13(2)(d) doe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
