SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Online)(All) 22

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Pathak, Beg, Tripathi, JJ
Notified Area Committee v. Sri Ram Singhasan Prasad Kalwa


1. This appeal is filed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition of the respondent. The Bench of two Judges, by whom the appeal was at first heard, referred it to a larger Bench on account of a conflict between two Full Bench decisions. Hence the appeal is listed before us.

2. The Notified Area Committee of Mohammadabad, the first appellant, assessed the respondent with a tax of Rupees 281.25 on his circumstances and property. Rs. 250/- was the amount of tax on circumstances, and Rs. 31.25 on property. Annexure B to the writ petition suggests that he was carrying on some business and had a house. The tax was assessed on March 18, 1968. This assessment was quashed by the learned Single Judge.

3. Far back in 1872, Mohammadabad became a town area. Town areas are now governed by the Town Areas Act , 1914. S.14 of this Act provided for the imposition of certain taxes including a tax on a man's circumstances till a part of the year 1948. In that year S.14 was reshaped. The substituted section materially read:
"(1) Subject to any general rules or special orders of the Local Government in this behalf, the taxes which a committee may impose are the following:
(









































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top