Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
N. S. Raghavan, J
Delhi Cloth and General Mills – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. minimum price regulation under the sugarcane control order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factors for minimum price fixation as per control order. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments against the process of consultation and price fixing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. the role of consultation and relevance of prior recoveries. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. challenges to recovery calculation period and principles. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. justification for considering sugar recovery periods. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. legality of price fixation on factory basis. (Para 15) |
| 8. contestation of transportation rebate calculations. (Para 16 , 19) |
| 9. judgment outcomes concerning minimum price and transportation rebates. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause '3' of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 , the Central Government issued Notification No. GSR 484 (E) / ESS. Com / Sugarcane dated 1st October, 1978 fixing the basic minimum price of sugarcane for the crushing season 1978-79 at Rs.10/- per quintal linked to a recovery of 8.5% or below with a premium of 11.7647 paise per quintal for every 0.1% increase in recovery over 8.5%. The notification also specified in the schedule annexed thereto the minimum pric
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
