ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A. K. Sikri, J
M/s. Electronic Industries of India – Appellant
Versus
U.P. Financial Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. scope and definitions of duties under applicable acts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. differences between the stamp act and town improvement act in terms of duty application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. interpretation of simple mortgage and its classification under the law. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. final ruling on the applicability of penalties and impounding. (Para 18) |
1. The questions referred to us for opinion under S.57 of the Indian Stamp Act are : -
1. Whether an instrument of simple mortgage (Mortgage without possession of immovable property situated in an area to which the U.P. Town Improvement Act 1919 (VIII of 1919) as amended by the Local. Self - Government Laws (Amendment) Act, 1966 (XXIX of 1966) has been made applicable) is a deed of transfer of immovable property within the meaning of S.67 - H of the said Act ?
2. Whether a public officer is barred from impounding (a document) under S.33 and the Collector is barred from imposing any deficit duty and penalty under S.40 and realising the same under S.48 of the Stamp Act on a deed of transfer of immovable property situated in an area to which the U.P. Town Improvement Act, 1919 applied, on whi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.