Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Judge A, J
Raj Hans Infratech (P) Ltd. and Another v. State of U.P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial case setup and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's observations on procedural nature and authority. (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 30) |
| 3. arguments and counterarguments presented. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. ratio concerning the correction of clerical errors. (Para 17 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 28) |
| 5. final ruling and directive issued. (Para 31 , 33 , 34) |
1.Petitioners are two registered private limited companies duly incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act. They are sister companies.
2.The petitioner - companies were allotted plot No. 6 - B and 6 - A respectively in Sector - I, district Gautambudh Nagar by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority having value of Rs.18,11,84,248/- and Rs.22,19,63,683/-, respectively. The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vide letter dated 24.3.2011 required both the companies to furnish stamp papers equivalent to 5% of the value of the plots allotted to them for the purposes of execution of the lease deeds.
3.Petititioner No. 1 was required to pay stamp duty of Rs.1,24,10,000/- and petitioner No. 2 Rs.1,52,02,992/- as per the calculation made by their counsel. Since the amount of stamp d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
