Nawal Kishore v. State of U. P. and Another - 2015 Supreme(Online)(All) 54

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(Online)(All) 54

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Aditya Nath Mittal, J.
Nawal Kishore v. State of U. P. and Another

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, learned special counsel for the State
For the Respondents: learned AGA for the State, learned special counsel for the State

Table of Content
1. filing crpc petitions and orders (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations of forgery and corruption (Para 3)
3. petitioner's argument on cognizance (Para 4 , 5)
4. citing precedent on judicial notice and investigation (Para 6 , 7)
5. limited scope of s.482 crpc (Para 8)
6. court discretion in granting bail (Para 9)
7. coercive action and high court's discretion (Para 11)
8. further investigation allowed under s.173(8) (Para 12 , 17 , 18)
9. cognizance on supplementary charge-sheet (Para 14 , 15)

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, learned special counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. Petition No. 3570/2013 under S.482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to set aside the order dated 11.07.2013 by which the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner and has been summoned to face the trial. Further prayer has been made to quash the charge - sheet dated 10.07.2013 in Case Crime No.11 of 2013.
Second petition No. 669/2014 under S.482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned cognizance order dated 27.01.2014, passed in Criminal Case No. 16/2013 State v. Nawal Kishore and also to quash the impugned supplementary charge - sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 Supreme(Online)(All) 54

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURTAditya Nath Mittal, J.Nawal Kishore v. State of U. P. and Another

Cases Referred (6)

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Aditya Nath Mittal, J.
Nawal Kishore v. State of U. P. and Another