Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Not mentioned,
Shri Ram Chandra Mission – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over authority of mission/society (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of writ petitions filed (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. recognition and roles of management (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. historical background of mission/society (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. interpretation of election provisions post amendment (Para 70 , 72 , 74 , 76) |
| 6. conclusion on management authority and elections (Para 127 , 128 , 130 , 131 , 132) |
| 7. final dismissal of all writ petitions (Para 134 , 135 , 136) |
1. This bunch of eleven writ petitions relate to a common matrix i.e. the dispute relating to authority for management and administration of Shri. Ram Chandra Mission / Society (hereinafter referred to as 'Mission / Society') registered under Societies Registration Act , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1860').
2. Broadly, these writ petitions are in four sets. There are three writ petitions in which dispute relating to renewal of registration of Mission / Society under S.3/3 - A of Act, 1860 is involved.
3. Writ Petition No. 8950 of 2001 (hereinafter referred to as 'first writ petition'), has been filed on behalf of Mission / Society through its Treasurer Sri. Surendra Kumar Dixit, seeking writ of ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
