ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
*Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, C. J., Dilip Gupta, Yashwant Varma, JJ.
Ashutosh Shrotriya and Others v. Vice Chancellor Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural order for writ petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. criteria for defining civil judgments. (Para 5 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 30) |
| 3. routine orders do not constitute judgments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 27 , 29 , 35) |
| 4. interlocutory judgments affect vital rights. (Para 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 26) |
| 5. refusal of interim relief is procedural. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
1. The issue
The reference to the Full Bench has been occasioned by a referring order of a Division Bench dated 15 September 2008. The following questions have been formulated for decision:
"(1) Where a learned Single Judge while hearing a writ petition calls for counter and rejoinder affidavits, but does not pass any order on the stay application either granting or refusing a stay, will the order amount to a refusal of interim relief to the petitioner either temporarily or impliedly and a 'judgment' within the meaning of Chapter VIII R.5 of the Rules of the Court, 1952;
(2) Does an order which adversely affects the valuable rights of a party by a temporary or implied refusal of interim relief have the trappings of a judgment."
2. The appellants sought a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the University to permit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.