Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Vikas Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural introduction of the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of the crime and police investigation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of the post-mortem findings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. recovery of evidentiary items from accused. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. summary of trial proceedings. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. arguments by the defense. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. prosecution's response and arguments. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. analysis of witness testimonies. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. criteria for evaluating circumstantial evidence. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 10. final judgment and sentencing. (Para 76 , 79 , 82 , 83) |
1. Both these criminal appeals, arising out of the same judgment and order dated 1.2.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (FTC Ist), Muzaffar Nagar in S.T. No. 184 of 2004 (State of U.P. Versus Rajesh Saini and others), were connected vide order dated 13.2.2007 of this Court and are hereby decided by this common judgment.
2. The facts in brief, if the case of the prosecution were true, reveal the tragic case of one young boy Abhishek alias Lovey, who was kidnapped for ransom and was chopped off into two parts by the accused appellants, one of whom (appellant -
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
