Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Hasmukh Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal representation and submission to court. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the apartment booking case. (Para 3) |
| 3. challenge to order and jurisdiction issues. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments regarding jurisdiction and seat of arbitration. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. clarification on execution jurisdiction post-arbitration. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. reiteration of judicial authority under s.42 of the act. (Para 19 , 34) |
| 7. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 41 , 42) |
1. Heard Sri Vidhu Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anurag Khanna, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsels for the respondent.
2. This petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 18.08.2021 passed by Presiding Officer, Commercial Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, in Misc. Application No. 6 of 2020 in Arbitration Application No. 26 of 2019, Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. v. Hasmukh Prajapati, preferred u/S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (arising out of award dated 16.02.2019 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (Sole Arbitrator), New Delhi, in Arbitration No. 15 of 2018, Hasmukh Prajapati v. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
