HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW Vaishnavi Mishra And Another .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar, Adarsh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

A.F.R.

Court No. - 8 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners assail the order dated 07.02.2026, passed by the Family Court in Case No.4208/2025, whereby an application for seeking exemption of the cooling period of six months, as provided under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, 'the Act of 1955'), has been rejected.

3. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the Family Court has erred in rejecting the application without noticing the fact that all the conditions applicable and necessary for exempting the cooling of period relating to a petition under Section 13-B of the Act of

1955, were duly met.

4. The trial Court upon entertaining the petition under Section 13-B of the Act of 1955 fixed the next date as 27.05.2026 for filing of the second motion. By the very same order, the Family Court directed the p