SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1026

Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


AFR HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW Manoj Kumar Thru. His Son Mudit Kumar …..Petitioner(s)

Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 4 others …..Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, Prashant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.

HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Personal affidavit of the Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Government of U.P. filed today in Court is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for respondents no.1 to 4 and perused the records including the case diary as produced by the learned AGA.

3. There is consensus at the bar that the facts of the case including the points in dispute and the consideration of the same has already been made by this Court vide order dated 24.04.2026. For the sake of convenience, the order dated 24.04.2026 is reproduced below:-

"1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the respondent nos.1 to 4. Perused the records produced by the learned AGA.

2. No notice be issued to respondent no.5, who is the complainant.

3. By means of the instant petition in the nature of habeas c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top