SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1194

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIJAY KUMAR GAUTAM @ KALLU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14204 of 2026 Vijay Kumar Gautam @ Kallu .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jagadish Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

1. Heard Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State- respondents and perused the record.

2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 57 of 2026, under Sections 3/5-A/8 of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 109(1) of B.N.S. and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Suriyawan, District Bhadohi, during pendency of the trial.

3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that one country made pistol, some live and empty cartridges and some slaughtering instruments are said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top