SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1354

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VINOD PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15132 of 2026 Vinod Pal .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ripusudan Dubey, Savita Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.61 of 2026, under Section 2(b)(xi), 2(b)(xvii), 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention)

Act, 1986, Police Station- Gagaha, District- Gorakhpur.

3. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Only single case has been shown in the gang chart against the applicant and in the said case, the applicant is on bail. The applicant has not been convicted in any offence.

The applicant is in jail since 17.03.2026.

4. The Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail and has contended that the applicant has a criminal history of one other case being Case Crime No.336 of 2016, under Sections 302, 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top