HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Rudram Surya Rao (Died) – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Ms.Grandhi Priyanka, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.V.Satish, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Shaik Umar Abdullah, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S.V.S.S.Siva Ram, Ld. Counsel for Respondent No.5 and Ms. M.Rose, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Ld. Standing Counsel for ZPP, MPP and Gram Panchayat.
2. The prayer in the Writ is as under: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon‟ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or direction, declaring the highhanded action of the petitioner‟s shed and removed the coconut trees without following procedure of law under Land Encroachment Act or Panchayat Raj Act and without giving any notice to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of the Articles 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to demolish the structures and not to remove the coconut trees an extent of 1000 Square yards out of the total extent Ac.1-65 cents covered under R.S.No.523 of Chinakondepudi Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District and pass such other order or orders as the Ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.