Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
M/s. RKEC Projects Limited – YFC Projections pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed to declare bid rejection illegal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent provided detailed reasoning for bid rejection. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments questioned bid rejection validity. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court reviewed the rejection procedure and legality. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. judicial review principles regarding tender decisions. (Para 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed; no merits found in the claims. (Para 31 , 32) |
::ORDER::
The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.2 in disqualifying the technical bid of the petitioner vide online rejection dated 31.07.2024 in relation to the tender issued vide RFP No.CPMGSUWATEN GG20203012 dated 29.12.2023 as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The averments in the affidavit, in brief, are that RKEC Projects Limited – YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., entered a joint venture to take part in a tender floated by respondent No.2 vide RPF No.CPMSUWATENGG2023012, dated 30.12.2023, inviting bids for the major upgradation of Visakhapatnam Railway Station, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on EPC Mode. Both companies were incorporated under the Companies Act . The petitioner is a construction company with vast exper
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
