Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
Chintha Adi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused's circumstances in the ongoing investigation. (Para 1) |
| 2. contentions regarding charges and legal defenses. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's directive on police investigation approach. (Para 3) |
| 4. conclusion regarding the petition and outcomes. (Para 4) |
FRIDAY.THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6297/2025 Between:
Chintha Adi Reddy ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
HARINATH.N,J HN, J Crl.P.No.6297 2025 The Court made the following Order:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is arraigned as Accused No.1 in Crime No. 104 of 2025, on the file of Ramachandrapuram Police Station, Dr.B.R.A.Konaseema District, for the alleged offence under Sections 111(2), 318(4), 61(2)
read with Section 3 (5)
of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Gaming Act .
2. It is submitted that the petitioner is not arraigned as an accused in any other crime except for the present case. It is fu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
