Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SMT V.SUJATHA, J
A JAGADA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim protection of historical temples. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court reviews legal actions and ensures due process. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court directs cessation of demolition actions. (Para 8) |
| 4. writ petition disposed with orders. (Para 9) |
ORDER
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…. to issue a direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus,
i. declare the action of the respondents in attempting to demolish/ remove Om sakthi Temple and Satyamma Temple existed in Sy.No.408/1 of Agaramapalli (V), Irala (M), Chittoor District, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
ii. To declare that the temples in question have been in existence and used for public purpose since time immemorial by the villagers of Agarampalli and neighboring villages, and therefore deserve protection and regularization in accordance with law.
iii. and Consequently direct the respondents to take immediate steps to regularize and protect Om sakthi Temple and Satyamma Temple in Sy.No.408/1 of Agarampalli (V), Irala (M), Chittoor Dist
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
