ANDHRA PRADESH LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT, 1905
This Act may be cited as the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905. It extends to the whole of the State of Andhra Pradesh.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, was enacted to address the issue of unauthorized occupation of government lands. This legislation provides a framework for the eviction of individuals who occupy land without legal authority, ensuring that public lands are preserved for their intended use.
Section 1 of the Act outlines the short title and extent of the legislation. It establishes the Act as the "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905" and specifies that it applies to the entire state of Andhra Pradesh.
The scope of Section 1 is limited to defining the title and geographical applicability of the Act. It sets the foundation for subsequent sections that detail the procedures and penalties related to land encroachment.
While Section 1 itself does not prescribe any punishments, subsequent sections of the Act outline penalties for unauthorized occupation of land, including eviction and potential imprisonment for repeat offenders.
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 1 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, highlighting its significance and implications in the context of land management and public policy.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a) "Collector" means any officer incharge of revenue division and includes a Deputy Collector, a Sub Collector and an Assistant Collector;
(b) Deputy Tahsildar means the Deputy Tahsildar in independent charge of a taluk or Sub Taluk, the dependent Deputy Tahsildar of a Sub Taluk, or the Headquarters Deputy Tahsildar, in whose jurisdiction the land is situate and includes a Special Deputy Tahsildar.
(c) "Tahsildar" means the Tahsildar in whose jurisdiction the land is situate and includes Special Tahsildar.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, was enacted to address unauthorized occupation of government lands in the state of Andhra Pradesh. It provides a legal framework for the eviction of encroachers and establishes penalties for such unauthorized occupations.
Section 1(a) of the Act specifies the short title and extent of the legislation, stating that it may be cited as the "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905" and that it extends to the whole of the State of Andhra Pradesh.
The scope of Section 1(a) is primarily administrative, providing clarity on the title and geographical applicability of the Act. It sets the foundation for subsequent sections that detail the procedures and penalties related to land encroachment.
While Section 1(a) does not prescribe specific punishments, the Act as a whole includes provisions for penalties and eviction processes for unauthorized occupation of land, which are detailed in later sections.
Title - The Act is officially titled the "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905," establishing its identity in legal discourse. - [ "Short title and extent | The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act"]
Geographical Applicability - The Act extends to the entire state of Andhra Pradesh, ensuring comprehensive coverage of government lands. - [ "Short title and extent | The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act"]
Purpose - The primary purpose of the Act is to provide measures for checking unauthorized occupation of government lands. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Administrative Clarity - Section 1(a) lays the groundwork for understanding the administrative framework of the Act, including roles of officials like the Collector and Tahsildar. - [ "The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - KanoonGPT"]
Foundation for Enforcement - By defining its title and extent, Section 1(a) serves as a foundation for the enforcement mechanisms outlined in subsequent sections. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Legislative Intent - The Act reflects the legislative intent to curb unauthorized land occupation, which is a significant issue in land management. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Historical Context - Enacted in 1905, the Act has historical significance in the evolution of land laws in India, particularly in the context of government land management. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Legal Framework - The Act provides a legal framework for addressing disputes related to land encroachment, which is crucial for maintaining public land integrity. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Judicial Interpretation - Courts have interpreted the provisions of the Act in various cases, emphasizing the need for clarity in land ownership disputes. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Public Interest - The Act serves the public interest by ensuring that government lands are protected from unauthorized occupation, which can lead to mismanagement and loss of public resources. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Role of Authorities - The Act empowers local authorities to take action against encroachers, thereby decentralizing the enforcement of land laws. - [ "The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - KanoonGPT"]
Legal Recourse - It provides a mechanism for legal recourse for government authorities to reclaim encroached lands, ensuring accountability. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Impact on Land Rights - The Act has implications for land rights, particularly for individuals claiming adverse possession, as it prioritizes government ownership. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Summary Eviction Process - The Act allows for a summary eviction process, which is crucial for quick resolution of encroachment issues. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Penalties for Non-compliance - While Section 1(a) does not specify penalties, the Act includes provisions for fines and imprisonment for unauthorized occupation. - [ "The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - KanoonGPT"]
Judicial Oversight - The Act allows for judicial oversight in cases of disputed ownership, ensuring that encroachment actions are not arbitrary. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Encroachment Definition - The Act provides a clear definition of encroachment, which is essential for legal proceedings related to land disputes. - [ "The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - KanoonGPT"]
Public Awareness - The existence of the Act raises public awareness about land rights and the consequences of unauthorized occupation. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Indian Kanoon"]
Future Amendments - The Act has been subject to amendments to address evolving land management challenges, reflecting its adaptability. - [ "Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1905"]
(1) All public roads, street, lanes and paths, the bridges, ditches, dikes and fences, on or beside the same, the bed of the sea and of harbours and creeks below high water mark, and of rivers, streams, nalas,lakes, and tanks, and all canals and water courses, and all standing and flowing water, and all lands, wherever situated, save in so far as the same are the property
(a) of any Zamindar, poligar, mittadar under jagirdar, shrotriemdar or inamdar or any person claiming through or holding under any of them, or
(b) of any person paying shist, Kattubadi, jodi, poruppu or quit rent to any of the aforesaid persons, or
(c) of any person holding under roytwari tenure, or in any way subject to the payment of land revenue direct to Government, or
(d) of
The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, originally enacted by the legislature of the erstwhile Madras State, was designed to address unauthorized occupation of government lands and related properties. Post-formation of Andhra Pradesh, the Act's nomenclature and provisions have been retained with modifications to suit regional needs. Its primary aim is to protect public lands, water bodies, roads, and other government properties from encroachment and illegal occupation, establishing a legal framework for eviction and penalties. The Act operates within the broader context of land management and public property protection, complementing other statutes like the Land Grabbing Act and the Civil Procedure Code.
Section 2 of the Act defines the scope of land and water resources deemed to be property of the government. It establishes that:- All public roads, streets, lanes, paths, bridges, ditches, dikes, fences, and beds of seas, harbours, creeks, rivers, streams, lakes, tanks, canals, and water-courses, whether existing or subsequently made, are vested in the government.- Lands not specifically enumerated but used for public utility or water management are also under government ownership.- All such lands are subject to the provisions of the Act concerning encroachment, eviction, and penalties.
The core elements of Section 2 include:- Broad Definition of Land and Water Resources: Encompasses all public roads, water bodies, and water-related lands.- Government Ownership: Clarifies that these resources are property of the government, whether existing at the time of the Act's commencement or created thereafter.- Inclusion of Adjacent Land: Extends to any adjacent land not private property that pertains to the water bodies or other resources.- Scope for Future Inclusions: The provision allows for the inclusion of additional water bodies or lands as per subsequent notifications or regulations.
Section 2 sets the foundation for the subsequent enforcement provisions of the Act:- It applies to all lands and water resources used for public purposes or deemed to be government property.- It covers both existing and future water bodies or lands created or designated for public use.- It provides the legal basis for government action against encroachment on these resources.- The section's broad language ensures comprehensive coverage, including silted-up or abandoned tanks, provided they were once used for public or communal purposes.
While Section 2 itself is a definitional provision and does not prescribe penalties, violations of the subsequent provisions—such as unauthorized occupation or encroachment—are punishable under the Act:- Section 5: Defines liability and penalties, including fines and imprisonment, for unauthorized occupation.- Section 6: Provides for summary eviction procedures.- Section 7: Mandates notices and opportunity to be heard before eviction.- Section 7-A: Addresses eviction of encroachment by groups.- Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, or both, depending on the nature of the encroachment and violation.
In summary, Section 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, provides a comprehensive definition of government-owned lands and water bodies, establishing the legal foundation for subsequent enforcement, eviction, and penalties. Its broad scope ensures that all public lands and water resources, whether existing or future, are protected from encroachment, aligning with constitutional principles and land management policies.
(1) Any person who shall unauthorisedly occupy any land which is the property of Government shall be liable to pay by way of assessment
(i) if the land so occupied forms an assessed survey number or part thereof, the full assessment of such number for the whole period of his occupation or a part thereof proportionate to the area occupied, as the case may be , provided that, for special reasons, the Collector or subject to his control the Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar may impose the full assessment of such number or any lesser sum irrespective of the area occupied;
(ii) if the land so occupied be unassessed, an assessment on the area occupied calculated for the same period at the rate imposed on lands of a similar quality in the neighbourhood, or at the highest dry or wet rate of the village, as the case may be, or when no such rates exi
The decision as to the rate of amount of assessment rent or fee, payable under Section 3 shall be recorded in writing and shall not be questioned in any civil court.
Any person liable to pay assessment under Section 3 shall also be liable at the discretion of the Collector or subject to his control, the Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar to pay in addition by way of penalty
(i) if the land be assessed land, a sum not exceeding five rupees or, when ten times the assessment payable for one year under Section 3 exceeds five rupees, a sum not exceeding ten times such assessment, provided that no penalty shall ordinarily be imposed in respect of the unauthorized occupation of such land for any period not exceeding one year.
(ii) if the land be unassessed, a sum not exceeding ten rupees, or when twenty times the assessment payable for one year under Section 3 exceeds ten rupees, a sum not exceeding twenty times such assessment.
(1) Any person unauthorisedly occupying any land for which he is liable to pay assessment under Section 3 may be summarily evicted by the Collector, Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar, and any crop or other product raised on the land shall be liable to forfeiture and any building or other construction erected or anything deposited thereon shall also, if not removed by him after such written notice as the Collector, Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar may deem reasonable, be liable to forfeiture. Forfeitures under this section shall be adjudged by the Collector, Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar and any property so forfeited shall be disposed of as the Collector, Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar may direct.
(2) Mode of eviction :- An eviction under this Section shall be made in the following manner, namely: By serving a notice in the manner provided in Section 7 on the person reputed to be in occupat
Before taking proceedings under Section 5 or Section 6 the Collector or Tahsildar, or Deputy Tahsildar, as the case may be, shall cause to be served on the person reputed to be in unauthorised occupation of land being the property of Government, a notice specifying the land so occupied and calling on him to show cause before a certain date why he should not be proceeded against under Section 5 or Section 6. Such notice shall be served in the manner prescribed in Section 25 the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864, (Act II of 1864) or in such other manner as the State Government by rules or orders under Section 8 may direct.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (originally enacted as the Madras Land Encroachment Act) is a colonial-era legislation designed to provide measures for checking unauthorized occupation of lands belonging to the Government. Section 7 of this Act constitutes the procedural cornerstone for initiating eviction proceedings against persons in unauthorized occupation of government land. It mandates the issuance of a prior notice to the person reputed to be in unauthorized occupation before any coercive action can be taken.
Section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 requires that before taking action for eviction, the authorized revenue officer shall cause to be served on the person reputed to be in unauthorized occupation of land being the property of Government, a notice requiring such person to show cause why he should not be evicted from the land. The provision embodies the principle of audi alteram partem (hear the other side) within the summary eviction framework.
Section 7 operates as a summary procedure for eviction of encroachers from government land. However, its scope is limited to cases where there is no bona fide dispute regarding title. If there is a genuine dispute about ownership, the summary procedure under the Act cannot be invoked, and the matter must be adjudicated before a civil court. The section does not bar the jurisdiction of civil courts entirely, particularly where questions of title are involved.
While Section 7 itself deals with notice and procedure, Section 6 of the Act provides the penal consequences: any person who unauthorizedly re-enters and occupies any land from which they were evicted shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine. Additionally, Section 7-A (inserted by amendment) empowers the District Collector to order immediate eviction when groups of persons have encroached upon government land.
Notice Requirement - Service of notice under Section 7 is mandatory before any eviction; failure to serve notice renders proceedings invalid.
Bona Fide Dispute - Summary proceedings under Section 7 cannot be invoked where there exists a bona fide dispute regarding title to the land; such disputes must be resolved through civil court adjudication. ["Indukuri Trimurthi Raju VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1559"]
Natural Justice - Courts must read Section 7 consistently with principles of natural justice unless the statute explicitly excludes them; the legislature is presumed to intend action in accordance with natural justice. ["T. Purushotham Rao VS State of Telangana - 2015 0 Supreme(AP) 756"]
Due Process - Due process requires consideration of explanations submitted by encroachers before any coercive action leading to dispossession; violation of this principle infringes Articles 14 and 21. ["Y. Anjinamma W/o Y. Lingaraju vs State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14005"]
Jurisdictional Limits - The Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to pass orders under both the Land Encroachment Act and the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act simultaneously; invoking both enactments is impermissible. ["P. Manjula VS Government of A. P. , Revenue Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary - 2012 0 Supreme(AP) 802"]
Assigned Lands - A person can be evicted under the Land Encroachment Act only if found in possession of Government land without legal basis; unless assigned land is resumed, the assignee or transferee cannot be treated as an encroacher. ["P. Manjula VS Government of A. P. , Revenue Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary - 2012 0 Supreme(AP) 802"]
Summary Procedure Limitation - The summary procedure under the Act cannot be used when lands are subject to longstanding possession with documented rights; such matters require civil court adjudication. ["Pranav Oil Processing Industry Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2021 0 Supreme(Telangana) 259"]
Alternative Remedy - Where an effective alternative remedy exists under Section 10 (appeal), writ petitions under Article 226 are generally not entertained; the appellate remedy must be exhausted. ["Mahavir Parshad VS Collector, Hyderabad Dist. - 2004 0 Supreme(AP) 1035"]
Personal Hearing - While Section 7 does not explicitly mandate a personal hearing, courts frequently direct authorities to provide personal hearings before passing final orders, ensuring fairness. ["N.Ramasamy vs District Collector, Dindigul District - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2624"]
Reasonable Opportunity - The requirement of "reasonable opportunity" under Section 7 is distinct from a mandatory "personal hearing"; personal hearings are not obligatory unless specifically directed by prior orders. ["Kings International Medical Academy Pvt. Ltd. vs District Collector, Chengalpattu - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2846"]
Land Classification - If the disputed land is patta land or not classified as government poramboke, Section 7 proceedings are without jurisdiction; the notice must pertain to government land. ["A. R. Meenakshi VS State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Principal Secretary & Commissioner of Land Administration - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1988"]
Long-Term Occupation - Long-term occupation alone does not confer a vested right to occupy government poramboke lands; eviction under Section 7 remains valid. ["R. Dhakshinamurthy VS The Collector & Another - 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 4431"]
Cart-Track Pathways - Cart-tracks running through patta land remain government land for public access; encroachment on such pathways is objectionable and action under Section 7 is valid. ["Kruthuventi Ramakrishna Rao VS The Province of Madras, represented by the District Collector, Krishna, Chilakalapudi - 1950 0 Supreme(Mad) 204"]
Civil Court Jurisdiction - The bar under the Act is not absolute; civil courts retain jurisdiction to declare title, as authorities under the Act cannot grant relief that a civil court is competent to grant. ["State of Andhra Pradesh VS Sattiraju - 2014 0 Supreme(AP) 1213"]
Disputed Questions - Where substantial factual disputes exist about land classification or ownership, courts decline to entertain writ petitions under Article 226 and direct parties to pursue appeals or civil remedies. ["K. Markabandu VS Tahsildar, Poonamallee - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 2672"]
Reasoned Orders - Authorities under Section 7 must pass reasoned speaking orders after considering all objections; cyclostyled or non-reasoned orders exhibit non-application of mind and are quashed. ["N.Ramasamy vs District Collector, Dindigul District - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2624"]
Protection Pending Decision - Courts frequently direct that possession of the alleged encroacher shall not be disturbed until final orders are passed after proper consideration of objections. ["M. Panchavarnam VS District Collector, Sivagangai - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 2990"]
Water Bodies - Occupation of "Eri Poramboke" (tank poramboke) or water bodies does not confer any right; eviction notices under Section 7 for such lands are generally upheld by courts. ["M. Vairamuthu VS The Collector & Another - 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 4423"]
Group Encroachment - Section 7-A empowers the District Collector to order immediate eviction without notice when groups of persons have encroached upon government land, constituting an exception to the notice requirement.
Re-entry Penalty - Any person who unauthorizedly re-enters and occupies land after eviction faces punishment of imprisonment up to six months or fine, as provided under Section 6 of the Act.
Encroachment by group of persons on Government lands and their eviction:-
(1) Where the District Collector knows or has reason to believe that a group or groups of persons without any entitlement and with the common object of occupying any land, which is the property of the Government, are occupying or have occupied any such land, and if such group or groups of persons have not vacated the land on demand by the District Collector or any officer authorised by him in this behalf, the District Collector shall, notwithstanding anything in this Act, order without any notice, the immediate eviction of the encroacher from the land and the taking of possession of the land: and thereupon it shall be lawful for any officer authorised by the District Collector in this behalf to evict the encroachers from the land by force, taking such police assistance as may be necessary, and take possessio
The State Government may make rules or orders either generally or in any particular instance
(a) regulating the rates of assessment, rent or fee leviable under Section 3:
(b) regulating the imposition of penalties under Section 5;
(c) declaring that any particular land or class of lands which are the property of Government shall not be open to occupation:
(d) regulating the service of notices under this Act. Such general rules or orders shall be made only after previous publication.
The amount of assessment, rent, fee and penalty imposed under this Act on any person unauthorizedly occupying any land shall be deemed to be land revenue and may be recovered from him as arrears of land revenue under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864.
(1) An appeal shall lie (a) to the Collector from any decision or order passed by a Tahsildar or Deputy Tahsildar under this Act, and (b) to the District Collector from any decision or order of a Collector passed otherwise than on appeal, and (c) to the Board of Revenue from any decision or order of a District Collector passed otherwise than on appeal. There shall be no appeal against a decision or order passed by the Collector or the District Collector on appeal, but the District Collector may revise any decision or order passed by a Deputy Tahsildar or Collector under this Act, and the Board of Revenue may revise any decision or order passed by any officer under this Act.
(2) Pending the disposal of any appeal or petition for revision under this Act, the District Collector or the Board of Revenue as the case may be, may suspend the execution of the order appealed against or soug
No appeal shall be brought after the expiration of sixty days from the date of decision or order complained of provided that in computing the period of sixty days, the time required to obtain a copy of the decision or order appealed against shall be excluded, but the appeal may be admitted after the period hereby prescribed when the appellant satisfies the authority to whom he appeals that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period.
Every petition of appeal under this Act shall be accompanied by the decision or order appealed against or by an authenticated copy of the same.
(1) The State Government may, in their discretion, at any time, either suo motu or on application made to them, call for and examine, the records relating to any decision or order passed or proceeding taken by any authority or officer subordinate to them under murder this Act for the purpose of satisfying themselves as to the legality or propriety of such decision or order, as to the regularity of such proceeding and pass such order in reference thereto as they think fit.
(2) The State Government may stay the execution of any such decision, order or proceeding pending the exercise of their powers under sub section (1) in respect thereof.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, was enacted to address unauthorized occupation of government lands. Section 12(A) specifically empowers the state government to review decisions made by subordinate authorities regarding land encroachments, ensuring that such decisions adhere to legal standards.
Section 12(A) grants the state government the authority to call for records and pass orders concerning decisions made by lower authorities. This includes the ability to stay the execution of any such decision or order.
The scope of Section 12(A) is limited to reviewing the legality and propriety of decisions made under the Act. It does not extend to altering the substantive rights of the parties involved.
While Section 12(A) itself does not prescribe punishment, related sections of the Act outline penalties for unauthorized occupation and re-entry after eviction.
This commentary provides an overview of Section 12(A) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, highlighting its significance in the legal framework governing land encroachments in the state.
Nothing in this Act contained shall be constructed as exempting any person unauthorisedly occupying land from liability to be proceeded against under any law for the time being inforce: Provided that if any penalty has been levied from any person under Section 5 of this Act, no similar penalty shall be levied from him under any other law in respect of such occupation.
No decision made or order passed or proceeding taken by any officer or authority or the State Government under this Act, not being a decision, order or proceeding affecting the title to the land of a person, shall be called in question before a civil court in any suit, application or other proceeding and no injunction shall be granted by any court in respect of any proceeding taken, or about to be taken by such officer or authority or State Government in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, was enacted to address unauthorized occupation of government lands. Section 14 of this Act plays a crucial role in delineating the jurisdictional boundaries of civil courts concerning decisions made under this Act.
Section 14 explicitly bars civil courts from questioning any decisions, orders, or proceedings taken by authorities under the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act. This provision aims to streamline the process of eviction and management of government lands by limiting judicial interference.
The scope of Section 14 is significant as it encompasses all actions taken under the Act, including eviction proceedings and penalties imposed for unauthorized occupation. This provision is designed to expedite the resolution of land encroachment issues by limiting the avenues for legal challenge.
While Section 14 itself does not prescribe specific punishments, it establishes a framework within which authorities can act against encroachers. Subsequent sections of the Act detail penalties for unauthorized occupation, including fines and imprisonment for repeat offenders.
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 14 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, highlighting its significance in the legal framework governing land encroachments in the state.
Every proceeding taken by a Collector for the recovery of any sum of money by way of penal or prohibitory assessment or charge from any person who has unauthorisedly occupied any land hereby declared to be the property of Government shall, if such sum has been recovered prior to the passing of this Act, be deemed to have been lawfully taken, provided that this section shall not apply to any suits pending when this Act comes into force in a Court of First Instance or in a Court of Appeal or affect the validity and operation of any decree or order already passed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Where a lease of land which is the property of Government expires or is terminated by the Government or any other authority competent in that behalf, the lessee or any other person remaining in possession of the land after such expiry or termination, or where land granted to any person is liable to be resumed by the Government for the breach or non observance of any of the conditions subject to which the grant is made and the Government or any other authority competent in that behalf have passed orders resuming the land for such breach or non observance, the grantee or any other person remaining in possession of the land after the passing of those orders, shall for the purposes of Sections 3 to 15 be deemed to be a person unauthorisedly occupying such land.
Nothing in this Act save as provided in Section 15A shall apply to any lands claimed by right of escheat [............] or reversion until such lands have been reduced into possession by the State Government.
SCHEDULE SCHEDULE
Form of warrant to be Issued by the Collector under Section 6 Seal
To
The Office in charge of the Civil Jail at..............
Whereas A.B. of ............................... has resisted (or obstructed) CD in removing E.F., (or himself, that is, the said A.B.) from certain lands in the village of .................................. in the ............................. taluk, and whereas it is necessary in order to prevent the continuance of such obstruction (or resistance) to commit the said A.B., to close custody, you are hereby required under the provisions of Section 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, to receive the said A.B., into the jail under your charge and there to keep him in safe custody for..........
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
AI Assistant
