Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. V R K Krupa Sagar, J
Varra Trimurthulu – Appellant
Versus
Buddaraju Venkata Rama Krishna Satya Surya Subba Raju – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant's appeal includes factual context of property sale. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. consideration of trial court's evidence evaluation and decisions. (Para 4 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. arguments for and against validity of the sale agreement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court confirmed findings of intent to sell and enforceability of the agreement. (Para 14) |
| 5. final decision dismisses appeal and upholds trial court's judgment. (Para 15) |
This is defendant’s appeal. The appellant owns Ac.10.00 cents of land. He and the respondent have been friends since the time of their childhood. The respondent owns Ac.30.00 cents of land. He also does business in prawn and fish feeds. The appellant has been a customer for purchase of the said feed for the use of the same in his own fish tanks. Controversy between them arose with reference to an agreement for sale said to have been executed by the appellant in favour of the respondent concerning the plaint schedule mentioned immovable properties.
Ex.A.2 is the registered sale deed dated 22.03.1995 under which the appellant had come to own the plaint schedule properties. It is stated that the appellant executed Ex.A.1-registered agreement for sale dated
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
