ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Mohamed Mirza, J
Narasimham D. V. v. State
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused's conduct during commission of crime under police presence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding inadmissibility of statements made to police. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on influence of accused's behavior. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 4. ruling on the consideration of accused's conduct. (Para 13) |
1. The question that has been referred to us viz., whether the conduct of the accused can be taken into consideration when the crime is committed in the presence of the Police' arose in Criminal Appeal No. 580 of 1965 before our learned brother Mohamed Mirza, J. The learned Judge felt that there was no direct case on the point and therefore, referred it to the Bench. The facts necessary to appreciate the contentions on either side may briefly be stated:
The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 580 of 1965 was working as Station Superintendent, Vijayawada, Southern Railways at the relevant period. On 21-6-1964 he demanded and accepted a sum of Rs. 100 from one of his subordinates as illegal gratification for having posted him to Outward Parcel seat and for retaining him in that capacity. It was stated that P. W. 1, Senior Assistant Parcel Clerk in the Parcel Office
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.