SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Online)(AP) 7

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A. K. N. Rao, J
Siddiqui N. A. (Dr.) v. State of A.P. and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Sri M. L. Ramakrishna Rao
For the Respondents: -

Table of Content
1. summarizes the plaintiff's grievances regarding the government's actions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. discusses the court fees context and valuations in injunction suits. (Para 4 , 8)
3. concludes with the decision of allowing the revision. (Para 5 , 11)
4. outlines the court's reasoning and decisions based on past case law. (Para 6 , 10)

1. Being aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated March 25, 1969, passed as per check slip No. 185 in the suit O. S. 364 of 1966 on the file of the III Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the plaintiff preferred the above revision under S.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The petitioner herein instituted the above suit for perpetual injunction, and the circumstances leading to the institution of the above suit, may now briefly be stated. One by name Dr. Mir Ahmed Ali, an employee of Medical Department in the erstwhile State of Hyderabad, was granted a Scholarship in the year 1949 by the then State Scholarship Committee to qualify himself as M. R. C. P. in a period of three years. The plaintiff along with the deceased, Syed Abdul Majed, executed the surety bond. That was unregistered and as such unenforceable in law. The plaintiff f



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top