ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Jagannadha Rao, J.
Company – Appellant
Versus
A.P. Electricity Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disconnection without notice leads to contested charges. (Para 1 , 4 , 29) |
| 2. court reviews prior payment attempts and disconnection timing. (Para 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 3. statutory obligations enforce compliance on board's actions. (Para 10 , 20) |
| 4. injunctions are justified based on prima facie cases. (Para 27 , 31) |
1. This is a miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner - Company for directing the respondent not to recover the minimum charges for the petitioner's land at Dinne Devarapadu, Kurnool District, for the period subsequent to 16-7-1985 on which date the respondent Electricity Board disconnected the supply of electricity. The minimum charges levied for the month of July, 1985 is Rs. 42,04,209.40 and again for the month of August, 1985 is a like sum of Rs. 42,04,209.40, and are to be levied thereafter.
2. There has been considerable litigation between the petitioner and the A.P. Electricity Board earlier but it is not necessary for the purpose of this miscellaneous petition to narrate the earlier litigation. A bill for the month of June, 1985 was served on the petitioner on 2-7-1985. According to the petitioner, the time for payment of the bill is 15 days from t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.