SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
G. Ramanujulu Naidu, Y. Bhaskar Rao, JJ
Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Ltd. (M/s) v. Govt. of A.P and Others
Writ Petition | No. [not specified]



The doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot compel the government to act against statutory provisions governing entitlement to incentives.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Interest Free Sales Tax Loans for Industries (Imposition of Ceiling) Act, 1987 - Promissory Estoppel - Petitioner sought entitlement for Interest Free Sales Tax Loan under G.O.Ms. No. 224, Industries and Commerce Department, dated 9-3-1976. Petitioner argued that its rights were vested before the enactment of Act 20 of 1987 which imposed a ceiling on such loans. Court found the petitioner failed to apply for registration within the stipulated deadlines and concluded: "the petitioner is not entitled to invoke the principles of 'promissory estoppel'" due to statutory prohibitions. (Paras 4, 40, 51)

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks declaration for relief under incentive scheme. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of the petitioner's establishment and relevant governmental incentives. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents' counterclaims regarding application and compliance with incentive guidelines. (Para 5 , 6)
4. reference to previous writ petitions addressing similar entitlements under promissory estoppel. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. court considers the applicability of 'promissory estoppel' principles against governmental actions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. principles of statutory limitation and the inability to invoke promissory estoppel against legislative provisions. (Para 37 , 50)
7. final conclusion dismissing the petition based on legal analysis. (Para 53)

1. This writ petition was filed seeking declaration that the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of Interest Free Sales Tax Loan under the Scheme introduced by the first respondent in G.O.Ms. No. 224, Industries and Commerce Department, dated 9-3-1976 by holding that the provisions of A.P. Interest Free Sales Tax Loans for Industries (Imposition of Ceiling) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') does not affect the rights of the petitioner to claim the above mentioned incentive.

2 The writ petition was filed on the basis of the following facts alleged in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.

3. The petitioner, which is a Public Limited Company having its registered Office at Adoni, is engaged in the business of manufacture of Caustic Soda and other allied products. It was set up at Gandiparla Village, Kurnool District, which is an industrially backward area. The unit is established at a total cost of Rs. 30 (thirty) crores with the collaboration of an Italian Company - M/s Oronzio De Nora Impaianti, Milani, Italy. Government of Andhra Pradesh in G.O. Ms. No. 224, Industries and Commerce Depart­ment, dated 9-3-1976 introduced new Scheme of State incentives for new industries to be set up in the State of Andhra Pradesh. According to the Scheme, the industries which go in to regular production on or after 1-1-1976 as well as such of those existing industries effect­ing substantial expansion are eligible for the incentives. One of the important incentives offered under the said G.O. Ms. No. 224, dated 9-3-1976 was Interest Free Sales Tax Loan. Entrepreneurs setting up industries will be eligible for Interest Free Sales Tax Loan equal to the tax paid by them under Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act on construc­tion material, plant and machinery equip­ment, during the pre - production stage and purchase or sales tax paid by them under the said Act for a period of five years from the date of going into regular production on raw - ­material, components and finished goods. Each year's loan is repayable in full at the end of the 10th year from the date of drawing such loan. The life of the scheme was for a period of five years expiring by 31-12-1980. Thereafter, the Government in G.O.Ms. No. 736, Indus­tries and Commerce (II and CP) Department, dated 28-12-1981 extended the incentives beyond 31-12-1980 till a revised Scheme is introduced.

4. It was further stated in the affidavit that by G.O. Ms. No. 375 Industries and Commerce (IA) Department dated 23-8-1985, revised package of State incentives were offered with the object of industrialisation and restricted the same to the identified three intensive industrial areas, viz., Adilabad, Srikakulam and Anantapur Districts. Kur­nool District was not included in the same. Even so, by another G.O. Ms. No. 437 Industries and Commerce (IA) Department, dated 10-10-1985, the Scheme of incentives offered in G.O. Ms. No. 224 dated 9-3-1976 was extended up to 28-9-1983. Thereafter, registration of applications seeking incentives under G.O. Ms. No. 224 dated 9-3-1976 was stopped with effect from 29-8-1983. Subsequently, by G.O. Ms. 433, Industries and Commerce (IA) Department, dated 31-7­ - 1986, registration of applications claimi









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top