ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
B. Sitapati, J
Sri K. Gopal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Election Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandate for overdue municipal elections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. constitution mandates regular elections; inaction violates democratic principles. (Para 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 3. court mandates elections to ensure local governance and democracy. (Para 34 , 36 , 37) |
1. Sri K. Gopal Reddy, claiming to be a public spirited person resorted to this pro bono publico / Public Interest Litigation seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting elections for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation in terms of the provisions of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 as arbitrary, illegal, malafide and discriminatory violating Art.14, Art.19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1.955 (for short "G.H.M.C.Act") and issue consequential directions to forthwith conduct elections for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation in terms of the Provisions of the G.H.M.C.Act.
2. The petitioner is a resident of Visakhapatnam City and engaged in contracts, besides involvement in political activities of Indian National Congress. He is one of the aspirants to contest in Municipa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.