Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V. Sujatha, J
TRANSCOM DMCC, DUBAI, UAE – Appellant
Versus
K P R AGROCHEM LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the maintainability of execution petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. circumstances surrounding the foreign decree's issuance and jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. legal framework involving execution of foreign decrees. (Para 13 , 16) |
| 4. application of res judicata in execution proceedings. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. conclusion regarding the reversal of the execution petition. (Para 35 , 37) |
COMMON ORDER
Civil Revision Petition No.1212 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner-Decree Holder under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short ―C.P.C.‖) challenging the order dated 03.02.2025 passed in E.A.No.1 of 2025 in E.P.No.21 of 2020 in CFI No.24 of 2019 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ramachandrapuram, whereby, the Executing Court allowed the said application filed Under Section 47 of C.P.C. holding that the decree passed by the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts in CFI No.24 of 2019 dated 05.09.2019 and re-issued on 29.03.2020 is not maintainable and un-executable.
2) Civil Revision Petition No.1206 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner-Decree Holder under Section 115 of C.P.C. challenging the order dated 03.02.2025 passed in E.P.No.21 of 2020 in CFI No.24 of 2019
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
