SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2954

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Battu Devanand, A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION (IE) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT – Appellant
Versus
K V RAVI SANKAR, S/O MURALI MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WORKING AS JL IN MET (MTS), GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE, VISSANNAPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT – Respondent
WRIT APPEAL NO: 888/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: GP FOR SERVICES II
For the Respondents: B RAMESH SC FOR BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, KAVITHA GOTTIPATI

Part-time employees are entitled to minimum pay but not to increments or allowances equal to regular staff due to lack of compliance with formal employment rules.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Writ of Mandamus - Action of authorities in not granting annual grade increments and HRA declared illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional for part-time Junior lecturers - The Court recognized the principle of equal pay for equal work, determining that the petitioners, while employed on a part-time basis, perform duties equivalent to regular employees without specific rules for their pay increments - The petitioners were to receive the minimum pay scale as per G.O.Ms.No.352, with arrears, while not entitled to other allowances - Learned Single Judge's orders granting HRA and increments were challenged in this appeal. (Paras 9-26)

(B) Equal pay for equal work - The court maintained that though part-time employees can seek equal pay, they won't gain increments or allowances equivalent to regular employees unless following specific procedures and rules. (Para 25)

(C) Judicial comity - Decisions made in favor of temporary or part-time lecturers must respect existing rules regarding employment standards and pay increments. (Paras 23-24)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed by part-time Junior lecturers claiming non-payment of annual grade increments and HRA despite fulfilling the required service conditions as per governing orders while being employed in full-time sanctioned posts for vocational courses.

Findings of Court:
The Court set aside the Single Judge's order granting increments and HRA, stipulating that the writ petitioners are entitled only to the minimum pay scale and dearness allowance.

Issues: The central issues included the legality of withholding increments and the standards by which wage parity applies to part-time employees.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that while part-time workers could claim equal pay for equal work, they are not entitled to the same incremental benefits or allowances due to their employment status—highlighting key judicial precedents on this matter.

Result: Appeal partly allowed; the learned Single Judge's orders were set aside.

Table of Content
1. writ petition seeks salary and allowances (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments against granting increments (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
3. court's rationale on equal pay principle (Para 9 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. determination of appeal outcomes (Para 12 , 13 , 25)
5. conclusion and observations on employment practices (Para 24 , 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT: ((Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma)

Introductory:-

This Writ Appeal is directed against the Order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.2351 of 2020.

2. The appellants are the respondents 1 to 23 in the Writ Petition. The respondents No.1 to 16 herein are the writ petitioners.

3. The writ petition was filed seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the annual grade increments and HRA from the date of payment of minimum times scale extended as per G.O.Ms.No.352 Education (I E 1) Department, dated 01.10.1994 along with arrears as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release annual grade increments and HRA from the date of payment of minimum time scale extended as per the said G.O..

4. The writ petition was allowed vide orders dated 29.10.2024. Aggrieved by the same, present appeal is filed.

5. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides.

6. For the sake of convenience, parties are hereinafter referred to as the writ petitioners and the respondents, as and how they are referred in the impugned orders.

Case of the Writ Petitioners:-

7. [i] All the writ petitioners are working as part time Junior lecturers in full time sanctioned posts of vocational courses in various government Junior Colleges and all of them were appointed prior to 25.11.2019 on part time basis. They are possessing requisite educational and technical qualifications for appointment to the post of lecturer in Junior Colleges. The details of the appointment, number of years of service, writ petitioner wise are as follows:-

[ii] The writ petitioners are engaged for total working hours in their respective colleges and their services were utilised continuously throughout the academic year for imparting education/training to the students and they are paid for full month. They worked as invigilators, internal examiners and they were sent to other colleges as external examiners and department officers. Accordingly, they are entrusted with duties on par with the regular lectures and treated as regular lectures for all purposes except payment of salary. There are 1248 regular posts in vocational courses in the State, out of them regularisation was effected in respect of 55 posts, who have completed 5 years of service by 25.11.1993 and the cut of date in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994.

[iii] G.O.Ms.No.352 Education [IE.1] Department, dated 01.10.1994 was issued directing the 4th respondent to take action immediately for payment of salary calculated at minimum pay scale and minimum time scale is being paid from the date of the G.O.. Relevant part of the G.O., vide para 4 reads as follows:-

“As the scheme formulated in G.O.Ms.No.212 Finance and Planning (Pin) Department dated 22.04.1994 is liberal and as it reflects the intention of government for regularization of existing personnel, who are working on daily wage/NMR etc., which was also upheld by the Supreme Court of India, Government through the G.O.166, education department dated 08.06.1994 extended similar facilities to the part time lecturers and ordered that the part time lecturers who have been working in regular vacancies or where work justified appointment of regular lecturer for more than 3 years by 30.04.1991 or teaching over 16 period per week shall be paid the salary calculated on the minimum scale of pay of Rs.1810-3230/- (revised pay scales, 1986 and Rs.3640-7580/- (revised pay scales, 1993) for lecturers and Rs.1550-3050/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top