Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J
V IJAYA KRISHNA VENI YARASANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioner and issues surrounding appointments. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. discussion on the legal framework governing seniority and applicable rules. (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 12) |
| 3. arguments presented by petitioners and respondents regarding seniority determination. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. concluding verdict and rationale from the court. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
COMMON ORDER:
Heard Sri J.Sudheer, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Motupalli Vijay Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents.
2. Since the issue raised in all the writ petitions is one and the same, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of all these writ petitions by way of a common order, taking W.P.No.15402 of 2022 as lead petition.
3. Vide impugned proceedings dated 04.08.2021, the inter-se seniority between the candidates was determined in terms of the provisions of Rule 33(b) of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules , 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules, 1996"). These proceedings were issued pursuant to the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 18.02.2015 in Civil Appeal No.5099 of 2006 and Civil Appeal No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
