SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16628

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
BODDU RATTAIAH – Appellant
Versus
R.R. SINGH – Respondent


ORDER:-

1. This Contempt Case has been filed against the orders dated 28.03.2023 in W.P.No.24837 of 2021 to the extent of interest at the rate of 12% per annum while paying a total amount of Rs.17,75,559/- under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

2. W.P.No.24837 of 2021 is filed claiming the following relief:

“..to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority in Ref No.VPRO-CDA/CL- II/01/2017 dated 16.04.2018 "reduction of basic pay to the minimum in the cadre of Development Officer Grade- I", Orders passed by the Appellate Authority in Ref.No.590-A dated 05.07.2019 "modifying the punishment to that of reduction of basic pay to 5 increments permanently" and the orders passed by the Revisional Authority Ref No.495-M dated 22.04.2020 modifying the punishment to that of "reduction of basic pay by 3 increments permanently" as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 311 (2) of Constitution of India and consequently declare that the entire orders imposed are without power and jurisdiction and the petitioner is entitled to all the regular pay benefits without there be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top