2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16869

APHC010219472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3208]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11083/2024 Between:
1. ALLA SREENIVASRAO, S/O. KOTILINGAM, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. TINNALURI SEETHARAMAIAH,, S/O. NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. ALLA GOPI,, S/O. ADHINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. RUDRAJADA HANUMANTHARAO,, S/O. SAIDHULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. PODILI KOTAIAH,, D/O. HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. YENIGALLA KOTESWARAO,, S/O. KANAKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. BOGARAPU VENKATANARAYANA,, S/O. ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, F/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
8. YENIGALLA NARSIMHARAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
9. KARANAM RAMARARO,, S/O. GOPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
10. K ANCHARLA SUBBARAO,, S/O. VENKATA KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. GUNTAGARLAPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
11. U NION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROADS, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
22. T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUMJOINT COLLECTOR1, , LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO. 167-A, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
33. T HE REGIONAL OFFICER, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (MORTH), D. NO. 38-2-3/2, GORLEDALATANNA VEEDHI, NEAR AMERICAN HOSPITAL, PUNNAMITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
44. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R B, NH DIVISION, MG ROAD, OPP RTO OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
55. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
66. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET REVENUE DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
77. T HE TAHSILDAR, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the objections of the petitioners vide proceedings Rc. No. 698/2022-G1 dated 24-04-2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to section 3 c (2) of National Highways Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further on the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in newspaper on 01-03- 2024 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners land as notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024 and set-aside the proceedings of the 2nd respondent Rc. No. 698/2022-G1 dated
24-04-2024 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful procession and enjoyment of petitioners land covered by Sy. Nos. 86/3, 86/4, 27/1,26/2, 27/2, 85/8, 85/1, 80/8, 81/1, 91/3, 81/7B, 90/7, 97/4, 97/3, 91/2, 96/2, 9/3, A3, AB4, and 85, of Guntagarlapadu Village, Narsaraopet town and mandal Palnadu District which were notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which Was published in the newspaper on 01-
03-2024Pending writ petition in this IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 10.05.2024 in IA.No.1 of 2024 in WP.No.11083 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 10.05.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11083 of 2024, and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioners to amend the prayer as follows:- it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the news paper on 01.03.2024 is as illegal arbitrary as it does not contain the brief description of the land which is mandatory under Sub Section 2 and 3 of National Highways Act, 1956, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners lands in pursuance of the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the newspaper dt.01.03.2024 by setting aside the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 and as well as the proceedings R.C.No.698/2022-G1 dt.24.04.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
4. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
5. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
6. MUDUNURI ANAND KUMAR (SC FOR NHAI)
WRIT PETITION NO: 11086/2024 Between:
1. B ANDLAMURI CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT
49 YEARS, R/O. ISSAPPAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. B ANDLAMURI SEETHAMMA, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. ISSAPPAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. C HEREDDY SIVARANI, W/O. BHASKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. ISSAPPAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. U NION OF INDIA, BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROADS, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
2. T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUMJOINT COLLECTORI, LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO. 167-A, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. T HE REGIONAL OFFICER MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (MORTH), D. NO. 38-2-3/2, GORLEDALATANNAVEEDHI, NEAR AMERICAN HOSPITAL, PUNNAMITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B, NH DIVISION, MG ROAD, OPP RTO OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT
6. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET REVENUE DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. T HE TAHSILDAR, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the objections of the petitioners vide proceedings Rc.No.698/2022-G1 dated 24-04-2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-Aof the Constitution of India and also contrary to section 3 c (2) of National Highways Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further on the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in newspaper on 01-03- 2024 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners land as notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024 and set-aside the proceedings of the 2nd respondent Rc. No. 698/2022-G1 dated
24-04-2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful procession and enjoyment of petitioners land covered by Sy. Nos. 4M, 55/A, 55/B, 47/B1, 55/A1, 61/C1, 55/A1 and 61/C of Issappapalem Village, Narsaraopet town and mandal Palnadu District which were notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024Pending writ petition in this Hon’ble Courtand pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 10.05.2024 in IA.No.1 of
2024 in WP.No.11086 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 10.05.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11086 of 2024, and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the news paper on 01.03.2024 is as illegal arbitrary as it does not contain the brief description of the land which is mandatory under Sub Section 2 and 3 of National Highways Act, 1956, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners lands in pursuance of the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the newspaper dt.01.03.2024 by setting aside the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 and as well as the proceedings R.C.No.698/2022-G1 dt.24.04.2024 issued by the 2nd a respondent pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
3. GP FOR REVENUE
4. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
5. MUDUNURI ANAND KUMAR (SC FOR NHAI)
WRIT PETITION NO: 11090/2024 Between:
1. M .PETER RAJU, S/O. PEDDA SOWRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. B . NUTHANA MARY PREMEELA RANI,, W/O. M. PETER RAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. M . SUNDAR RAO,, S/O. PEDDA SOWRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. P . ANNA MARY,, D/O. M. SUNDAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. M . PRAKASH RAO,, S/O. PEDDA SOWRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. N . ANTHONI NIRMALA MARY,, W/O. M. PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. L . VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
8. S . VEERA LAKSHMI, , W/O. S. SAMBA SIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. U NION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROADS TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
2. T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUMJOINT COLLECTORI, LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO. 167-A, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. T HE REGIONAL OFFICER, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (MORTH), D. NO. 38-2-3/2, GORLEDALATANNAVEEDHI, NEAR AMERICAN HOSPITAL, PUNNAMITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B, NH DIVISION, MG ROAD, OPP RTO OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET REVENUE DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. T HE TAHSILDAR, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the objections of the petitioners vide proceedings Rc.No.698/2022-G1 dated 24- 04-2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to section 3 c (2) of National Highways Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further on the 3A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in newspaper on 01-03-2024 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners land as notified in the 3 A notification dated 23- 02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024 and set- aside the proceedings of the 2nd respondent Rc. No. 698/2022-G1 dated
24-04-2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful procession and enjoyment of petitioners land covered by Sy. Nos. 501E, 46- ID, 46-1E, 46-1G, 46-1E, 46-ID, 46-1E, 46-1G, 49-ID, 46-1G, 46-1F, 48- A1B, 48-A1B2,48-A2B2, 45-1C, 45-ID, 46-1B, 46-1E, 61-B2, 61-A3, 255-1, 255-2, 255-3, 255-7 and 255-8, of Kesanupalli Village, Narsaraopet town and mandal Palnadu District which were notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024Pending writ petition in this Hon’ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 10.05.2024 in IA.No.1 of 2024 in WP.No. 11090 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 10.05.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11090 of 2024, and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the news paper on 01.03.2024 is as illegal arbitrary as it does not contain the brief description of the land which is mandatory under Sub Section 2 and 3 of National Highways Act, 1956, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners lands in pursuance of the 3-A notification dt:23.02.2024 which was published in the newspaper dt.01.03.2024 by setting aside the 3- A notification dt.23.02.2024 and as well as the proceedings R.C.No.698/2022-G1 dt.24.04.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) 4. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)
5. MUDUNURI ANAND KUMAR (SC FOR NHAI)
WRIT PETITION NO: 11092/2024 Between:
1. YADDANAPALLI ANIL PRATAP, , S/O. JOJAYYA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. POODOTA MERI VENILA, , W/O. PRAKASH BABU, AGED ABOUT
30 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. NAGOTHUINNAYYA,, S/O. SOWRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. NETTEMSWORI RANI,, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT
59 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. DOUPATI RENUKA,, D/O. INNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. DOUPATI INNAYYA,, S/O. PRAKASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. YADDANAPALLI RAJESH KUMAR,, S/O. MALKIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
88. YADDANAPALLI SUDHEER KUMAR,, S/O. MALKIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
99. SINGAMANENI VENKATA CHALAPATHI RAO,, S/O.
VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1010. V ELUGOTI RENUKA,, W/O. NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1111. P ATI SAMRAJYAM,, W/O. PEDDHAKOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1212. D OUPATI SUSEELA, , W/O. KIRAN RAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
.
1313. Y AMPARALASREENIVASARAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1414. M .NARRA AROGYA RAJU, , S/O. INNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT
1515. N ARRA AROGYA RAJU,, S/O. INNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1616. R EDDYMASU BALA SOWRAYYA,, S/O. SANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT
71 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1717. R EDDYMASU GOERGE PAPARAO, S/O. BALA SOURAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1818. K ANYADARA RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O. GOVA SOURAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
1919. P ULUKURI NAGESWAR RAO, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT
56 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2020. B ODDAPATIADHILAKSHMI, W/O. BIKSHALU RAO, AGED ABOUT
65 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2121. M ALLAVARAPU KIRAN CHANDRABOSE, S/O. INNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2222. K ANYADARA BALA,, S/O. JOJAYYA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2323. K ANYADARA MANASA,, W/O. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2424. Y ADDANAPALLI JOSEPH KIRAN KUMAR,, S/O. BALASOURAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2525. M ALLAVARAPU PRAMEELA, W/O. BOSE, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2626. G AALI MARIYADASU,, S/O. ANTHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2727. M AADENENI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2828. P OODOTA BALA JOYTHI,, W/O. SURESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2929. N ADENDLA SREENIVASRAO,, S/O. VENKAESWARLU. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3030. N IDAMANURI JOSEPH VENKATADAMBAIAH, S/O.
VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. RAVIPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. U NION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROADS, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
2. T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUMJOINT COLLECTOR1, LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO. 167-A, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. T HE REGIONAL OFFICER, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (MORTH), D. NO. 38-2-3/2, GORLEDALATANNAVEEDHI, NEAR AMERICAN HOSPITAL, PUNNAMITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B, NH DIVISION, MG ROAD, OPP RTO OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET REVENUE DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. T HE TAHSILDAR, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or order Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the objections of the petitioners vide proceedings Rc.No.698/2022-G1 dated 24- 04-2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-Aof the Constitution of India and also contrary to section 3 c (2) of National Highways Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further on the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in newspaper on 01-03- 2024 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners land as notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024 and set-aside the proceedings of the 2nd respondent Rc. No. 698/2022-G1 dated
24-04-2024 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners land covered by Sy. Nos. 125-A1A1, 496-C, 492-2R, 507-4C1, 17-3A, 17-3C, 517-53B1A-1, 17-1C1, 17-3C, 125-A1A-1, 125-A1A-2, 14- A3, 14-B1, 492-2-U, 1-9-C4, 13-El, 517- 53-B1A1, 26-A1, 26-A2, 17-3c. 17- 1A, 17-3C2, 17-3C-1, 118-1D3, 36-H, 494-1A1A, 494-2A, 494-2A-1, 17/3C, 118-1D3, 125-A1A2, 507-4C3-D, 507- 4C1, 507-4C3, 124-A1A, 124-A3A, 124-A3C, 127/A, 36-C-1 and 517-54C1, of Ravipadu Village, Narsaraopet town and mandal Palnadu District which were notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03- 2024Pending writ petition in this Hon’ble Courtand pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 10.05.2024 in IA.No.1 of
2024 in WP.No.11092 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 10.05.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11092 of 2024, and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioners to amend the prayer as follows:- it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the news paper on 01.03.2024 is as illegal arbitrary as it does not contain the brief description of the land which is mandatory under Sub Section 2 and 3 of National Highways Act, 1956, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners lands in pursuance of the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the newspaper dt.01.03.2024 by setting aside the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 and as well as the proceedings R.C.No.698/2022-G1 dt.24.04.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
3. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
4. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)
5. MUDUNURI ANAND KUMAR (SC FOR NHAI)
WRIT PETITION NO: 11095/2024 Between:
1. NALLAPATI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. KRISHNAYYA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPETTOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. NALLAPATI THIRUPATHAIAH,, S/O. KOTESWARUDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. NALLAPATI RAMA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT
45 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. KATIA SAMBASIVA RAO,, S/O. CHENNAKESAVULU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPETTOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. YARRAM VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. TIRUPATHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPETTOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. NADIPINENI APPAYYA,, S/O. BRHAMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPETTOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. UPPUTURI APPAYYA,, S/O. VENKATRAMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPETTOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
8. VANKAYALAPATI BHRAMAYYA, , S/O. VENKATAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
9. KORITAFA NAGABHUSHAN RAO,, S/O. ANJENEYULU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
10. N ALLAPATI RAMADEVI,, S/O. RAJASEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
11. N ALLAPATIKOTAMMA,, S/O. ANJEYULU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
12. N ALLAPATI CHANDRIKA,, . W/O. PEDDA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT
13. B APATHU PRABHAKAR REDDY,, S/O. VENKATESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
14. K OPPURAVURIVENKATARAMAKRISHNARAO,, S/O.
VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. U NION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROADS, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
2. T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM JOINT COLLECTOR1, LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO. 167-A, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. T HE REGIONAL OFFICER, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (MORTH), D. NO. 38-2-3/2 GORLEDALATANNAVEEDHI, NEAR AMERICAN HOSPITAL, PUNNAMITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B, NH DIVISION, MG ROAD, OPP- RTO OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET REVENUE DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. T HE TAHSILDAR, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2^nd respondent in rejecting the objections of the petitioners vide proceedings Rc.No.698/2022- G1 dated 24.4.2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to section 3 c (2) of National Highways Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further on the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in newspaper on 01-03- 2024 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners land as notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-03-2024 and set-aside the proceedings of the 2nd respondent Rc. No.
698/2022-G1 dated 24-04-2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners land covered by Sy. Nos. 251A1, 251B1 A, 150-3D, 149AC3-C, 149AC3-D, 149AC3, 149B3, 141-3D, 141-B1, 151-B3, 150-301, 141-BA3A, 141BB2. 152B2A1, 152C3A, 139-3, 176-A1, 166-B3, 146-AB1, 149-B1A, 150-3A, 149-AC3B, 149-AB2, 149- AC3E, 162/A3C, 162/B, 154-Aand 154- B of Jonnalaadda Village, Narsaraopet town and mandai Palnadu District which were notified in the 3 A notification dated 23-02-2024 which was published in the newspaper on 01-
03-2024Pending writ petition in this Hon’ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 10.05.2024 in IA.No.1 of
2024 in WP.No.11095 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 10.05.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11095 of 2024, and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioners to amend the prayer as follows:- it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the news paper on 01.03.2024 is as illegal arbitrary as it does not contain the brief description of the land which is mandatory under Sub Section 2 and 3 of National Highways Act, 1956, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners lands in pursuance of the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 which was published in the newspaper dt.01.03.2024 by setting aside the 3-A notification dt.23.02.2024 and as well as the proceedings R.C.No.698/2022-G1 dt.24.04.2024 issued by the 2 nd respondent pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
4. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
5. MUDUNURI ANAND KUMAR (SC FOR NHAI)