SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9694

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. Sreenivasa Reddy, J
REDDIPOGU PULLAMMA – Appellant
Versus
Y. NAGAMMA (Died) AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.1224 OF 2011



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.V. Raghu Veer
For the Respondents: T. Kumar Babu

A claim for succession benefits based on a second marriage and a will is unsustainable if the first marriage remains legally subsisting and the legality of the second marriage is not proven by cogent evidence.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking a succession certificate to claim the death benefits of the deceased, claiming to be the second wife and relying on a registered will and notarized affidavits. The first respondent, the first wife, contested the claim, asserting her status as the legally wedded wife and denying the petitioner's marriage to the deceased. The trial court dismissed the petition, finding that the first marriage was not dissolved and the second marriage and will were not proved. The primary issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to the succession certificate. The court reasoned that the petitioner failed to provide cogent evidence that the first respondent had remarried or that the first marriage was dissolved by a competent civil court. Furthermore, the court observed that the registered will was executed by relatives of the petitioner and contradicted the service records of the deceased, rendering the evidence untrustworthy. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is Dismissed, confirming the Order, dated 10.08.2011, passed in Succession OP No.66 of 2009 by the learned I Additional District Judge, Kurnool.

Table of Content
1. background of the succession claim and the trial court's initial dismissal based on lack of proof of marriage legality. (Para 1)

SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment/Order? Yes/No

2. Whether the copy of Order may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether His Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment/Order? Yes/No

JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY

Counsel for the Appellant (s) :

Sri K.V.Raghu Veer

Counsel for the Respondents :

Sri T. Kumar Babu, Counsel for R.1, R4 to R7

Gist:

Head Note:

Cases referred:

This Court made the following:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3327]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1224/2011

Between:

1. REDDIPOGU PULLAMMA, W/O. LTE THIRUPALU R/O.

H.NO. B/B-1, B. CAMP, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT

A N D

1. Y NAGAMMA DIED AND 2 OTHERS, W/O. LATE THIRUPALU R/O. H.NO. 87/858, DOCTORS COLONY, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (DIED AS PER LR'S 4 TO 7)

2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SILVER JUBILEE COLLEGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

4. Y CHITTEMMA, W/O. LATE VIVEKANANDUDU, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. SRINAGAR COLONY, BESIDE GHOUSE MASJID, KURNOOL-518005

5. Y LAVANYA, D/O. LATE VIVEKANANDUDU, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O. SRINAGAR COLONY, BESIDE GHOSE MASJID, KURNOOL-518005

6. Y SOUJANA, D/O. LATE VIVEKANANDUDU, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O. SRINAGAR COLONY. BESIDE GHOUSE MASJID, KURNOOL-518005

7. Y PAWAN KUMAR, S/O. LATE VIVEKANANDUDU, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O. SRINAGAR COLONY. BESIDE GHOUSE MASJID, KURNOOL-518005 RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 7 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR'S OF THE DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 28.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.3/2025

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal Under Section_____against orders

IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 2095 OF 2011

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to disburse death benefits of late Thirupalu to the 1st respondent pending disposal of the appeal

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 5020 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement of respondent no.1 in appeal and pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the abatement of appeal against the respondent no.1 and pass

IA NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit and bring the Legal Representatives of Respondent no.1 on record to contest the C.M.A. No. 1224 OF 2011 and all pending Interlocutory applications as the respondents 4 to 7 being the Legal representatives of Late Vivekanandudu and pass

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. K V RAGHU VEER

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

2. T KUMAR BABU

The Court made the following:

J U D G M E N T

Challenge in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the appellant herein/Petitioner, is to the Order, dated 10.08.2011, passed in Succession OP No.66 of 2009 by the learned I Additional District Judge, Kurnool (‘the learned trial Judge’ for short), whereunder the learned trial Judge, dismissed the petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for brevity ‘the Act, 1925’) for grant of Succession Certificate to the appellant herein/petitioner to claim death benefits of one Thirupalu, who died while working as Attender in Silver Jubilee College, Kurnool.

The parties to this C.M.A. will hereinafter be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top