Read full Act

R.6 Inventory and account

Inventory and account :_ The order for grant of probate or letters of administration shall direct the grantee to file in Court, within six months, and one year, respectively, the inventory and account prescribed by Section 277 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865, and Section 98 of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881 (now Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925).

---

Legal Commentary on Section R.6 of Andhra Pradesh Rules Under The Indian Succession Act 1925

Introduction

Section R.6 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, pertains to procedural aspects related to the grant of succession certificates, especially in contexts involving amendments, appeals, and procedural irregularities. The Indian Succession Act, 1925, as a principal legislation, governs testamentary and intestate succession in India, with specific provisions for procedural matters such as applications, appeals, and revocations. The Andhra Pradesh Rules supplement these provisions with local procedural guidelines.

What does Section R.6 Say?

Section R.6 deals with procedural matters related to applications for succession certificates, amendments, and appeals, emphasizing the process of filing, the scope of review, and the appellate procedures within the framework of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as adopted by the State rules.

Essential Ingredients

• Filing of applications for succession certificates in accordance with the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
• Procedure for amendments to applications or petitions under the rules.
• Grounds and process for appeal or review against orders relating to succession certificates.
• Clarification that proceedings are summary but subject to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, especially regarding parties and appeals.
• Emphasis on the importance of compliance with procedural rules for validity of applications and appeals.

Scope of Section R.6

• Applies to all applications and proceedings for succession certificates under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 within Andhra Pradesh.
• Covers procedural aspects including amendments, appeals, and revocations.
• Ensures uniformity in practice and adherence to legal standards for succession proceedings.
• Clarifies the relationship between local rules and the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
• Addresses the scope of judicial review and appellate jurisdiction in succession matters.

Punishment for Section R.6

• The section itself does not prescribe any specific punishment. However, violations such as filing false affidavits or non-compliance with procedural rules may attract penalties under relevant laws like Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code or contempt proceedings.

Legal Comments

• "Procedural compliance" - Emphasizes that applications under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, must strictly adhere to procedural rules, including amendments and appeals, to be valid [Section R.6].
• "Amendment procedures" - Clarifies that rejection of amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. during succession proceedings does not automatically entail appeal under Section 299, but can be challenged via revision [Section R.6].
• "Appealability" - Reiterates that orders refusing to revoke succession certificates are not appealable under Section 384 but can be challenged through revision under Section 115 C.P.C. [Section R.6].
• "Summary nature of proceedings" - Affirms that succession certificate proceedings are summary but do not preclude parties from filing suits or challenging orders via civil remedies [Section R.6].
• "Parties and intervention" - Permits third parties or legal heirs to intervene or be impleaded even in summary proceedings, aligning with the principle that procedural rules like Or. 1, Rule 10 C.P.C. are applicable [Section R.6].
• "Jurisdiction of courts" - Confirms that the District Judge or competent court exercising powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, must follow the procedure laid down in the Act and the Civil Procedure Code, including parties’ rights [Section R.6].
• "Revocation of certificates" - Proceedings for revocation under Section 383 are to be initiated based on grounds such as fraud, defect in proceedings, or subsequent findings; procedural compliance is essential [Section R.6].
• "Effect of decisions" - Decisions in succession proceedings are not final or res judicata; parties can institute civil suits to contest or challenge the certificates or orders [Section R.6].
• "Application for substitution" - Legal heirs can apply for substitution as parties without necessarily obtaining probate, provided procedural requirements are met, but proper notice and party inclusion are necessary [Section R.6].
• "Role of the Civil Procedure Code" - The provisions of the CPC, especially regarding parties, amendments, and appeals, are generally applicable unless explicitly excluded, ensuring procedural fairness [Section R.6].
• "Appeal against orders" - Orders refusing to revoke succession certificates or rejecting amendments are subject to revision, not appeal, highlighting the limited scope of appellate jurisdiction in such proceedings [Section R.6].
• "Court’s discretion" - Courts have discretion under Section 373(3) to grant certificates even if questions of law or fact are intricate, but procedural rules must be followed [Section R.6].
• "Local rules and national law" - The Andhra Pradesh Rules are designed to supplement the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and courts must interpret procedural issues in harmony with national law [Section R.6].
• "Legal heirs and rights" - The law permits legal heirs to file applications and seek succession certificates without prior probate, provided they establish their rights through proper evidence [Section R.6].
• "Rejection of applications" - Rejection of applications or amendments must be grounded in procedural or substantive irregularities; mere technical objections are insufficient [Section R.6].
• "Summary proceedings" - While proceedings are summary, they do not bar parties from raising substantive rights or contesting certificates through civil suits [Section R.6].
• "Inclusion of third parties" - The rules allow third parties to intervene or be impleaded, ensuring that all interested parties can be heard, aligning with principles of natural justice [Section R.6].
• "Legal remedies" - Parties aggrieved by orders can seek revision or challenge in civil courts, emphasizing procedural safeguards [Section R.6].

Summary Bullet Points

• "Procedural adherence" - Strict compliance with application and appeal procedures is mandatory [Section R.6].
• "Amendments" - Rejection of amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. can be challenged via revision, not appeal [Section R.6].
• "Appeals" - Orders refusing revocation of succession certificates are not appealable but can be challenged through revision [Section R.6].
• "Parties' rights" - Legal heirs and third parties can be impleaded or intervene, even in summary proceedings [Section R.6].
• "Court’s discretion" - Courts can grant certificates even if questions of law or fact are complex, within the ambit of Section 373(3) [Section R.6].
• "Revocation grounds" - Grounds for revocation include fraud, defect, or subsequent conflicting orders; procedural correctness is essential [Section R.6].
• "Finality of orders" - Orders in succession proceedings are not final; parties can institute civil suits to contest them [Section R.6].
• "Application for substitution" - Heirs can apply for substitution without prior probate, subject to procedural compliance [Section R.6].
• "Summary but fair" - Proceedings are summary but must adhere to principles of natural justice, including hearing all interested parties [Section R.6].
• "Local rules harmonization" - Andhra Pradesh Rules supplement the Indian Succession Act, ensuring procedural uniformity [Section R.6].

Conclusion

Section R.6 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, emphasizes procedural correctness, the scope of amendments and appeals, and the rights of parties, including third parties, within succession proceedings. It aligns local procedural practices with the principles of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, ensuring that proceedings remain fair, summary, yet comprehensive, with avenues for civil remedies and judicial review where necessary.

Legal Comments- "Procedural compliance" - Strict adherence to application, amendment, and appeal procedures is essential for validity [Section R.6].- "Amendment challenge" - Rejection of amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. can be challenged via revision, not appeal [Section R.6].- "Appeal limitations" - Orders refusing to revoke succession certificates are not appealable under Section 384 but are revisitable via Section 115 C.P.C. [Section R.6].- "Parties’ intervention" - Third parties and legal heirs can be impleaded or intervene, ensuring fair hearing [Section R.6].- "Summary proceedings" - Proceedings are summary but do not bar subsequent civil suits to contest rights [Section R.6].- "Court’s discretion" - Courts can grant certificates even if questions of law or fact are intricate, within statutory discretion [Section R.6].- "Revocation grounds" - Grounds include fraud, defect, or subsequent conflicting orders, requiring procedural correctness [Section R.6].- "Finality and review" - Orders are not final; parties can seek review or civil remedies [Section R.6].- "Legal heirs' rights" - Heirs can seek succession certificates without prior probate if they establish their rights properly [Section R.6].- "Local rules & national law" - Andhra Pradesh Rules are designed to supplement the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for procedural uniformity [Section R.6].

Note: This commentary synthesizes procedural aspects of Section R.6 with the broader legal framework of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, based on the provided sources and case law.

R.2 Application for probate or administration

Application for probate or administration :_ (1) An application for probate or letters of administration shall be by original petition, in Form No.2 or 3 and shall be accompanied by a notice to the Collector in Form No.4, signed by the applicant or his pleader, and by the affidavit prescribed by the Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 19-H(1). The said notice shall be signed by the Judge, and sent by him to the Collector.

(2) Unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, otherwise orders, notice of an application for letters of administration in Form No.4 shall be pasted on the notice board of the Court, and shall be served by the petitioner on all persons of the same degree of relationships, or of nearer degree than, the petitioner, sending the same in a pre

R.3 Age of minor to be stated

Age of minor to be stated :_ A petition for the grant of letters of administration under Section 215 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865, or Section 31 or Section 33 of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881 (now Sections 244 and 246 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925), shall, if the petitioner is acquainted with the facts, state the age of the minor or shall be accompanied by the affidavit of a person who is so acquainted stating the age of minor.

R.4 Probate or administration with will annexed

Probate or administration with will annexed :_ (1) If a will has been deposited with a Registrar of Assurances, an affidavit shall be filed stating the fact, and that the applicant intends to apply to the Court for a grant of probate or letters of administration with the will annexed, and praying that an order may be issued to the Registrar to forward the will to the Court; and thereupon the Judge may direct an order to issue accordingly. Upon the production of the will, the petitioner and the attesting witness shall attend at the Court house with the petition, and the will shall be annexed or exhibited to the petition which shall then be signed and verified.

(2) If the petitioner or the said witness is unable to attend at the Court house, the said affidavit shall

R.5 Administration and security bonds

Administration and security bonds :_ An administration bond shall be in Form No.The Court shall determine the actual amount of security to be given and may examine the proposed sureties as to their properties and liabilities and for this purpose may direct notice to issue to the proposed sureties and adjourn the further hearing of the application to a fixed day by passing an order in Form No.4-A. The proposed administrator and his sureties when approved by the Court shall execute the administration bond before the Judge or an officer authorised to take affidavits. The bond shall be filed in Court, not less than three days before the adjourned hearing, and if approved by the Judge, shall be signed by him in the margin.

R.8 Form of account

Form of account :_ The said account shall be in the form of a debtor and creditor account, all moneys and other property received by the executor or administrator being placed on the debit side, and all disbursements made by him being placed on the credit side; and a balance shall be struck. The account shall be headed with the cause-title of the matter, and shall be verified by the affidavit of the executor or administrator.

R.9 Extension of time to file inventory or account

Extension of time to file inventory or account :_ An application for further time to file an inventory or account shall be made by an interlocutory application entitled in the petition under which the grant of probate or letters of administration was made and shall be supported by affidavit stating the

R.12 Notice to caveator

Notice to caveator :_ Within five days after service of the said notice upon him, or such other period as the Judge appoints, the petitioner shall bring into Court a notice to the caveator, in Form No.8, a copy of the petition, and the prescribed fees for service for the same, and the provisions of the Code, and these Rules with respect to summons to a defendant, and service thereof, shall apply to the notice.

R.13 Application for succession certificate

Application for succession certificate :_ An application for a succession certificate shall be by original petition, in Form No.9.

R.13-A Person Applying for the Grant of Succession Certificate on behalf of a Minor to Apply for Appointment as a Guardian

Person Applying for the Grant of Succession Certificate on behalf of a Minor to Apply for Appointment as a Guardian :_ Where any person applies for the issue of a succession certificate on behalf of a minor, such person shall unless the aggregate amount or value of the debts or securities specified in the application does not exceed five hundred rupees or the Court otherwise orders, present an application under the Guardians and Wards Act praying for his appointment as guardian of the property of the minor. Unless the Court otherwise orders no succession certificate shall be granted to him unless he has been appointed as such guardian.

R.14 Extension or amendment of certificate

Extension or amendment of certificate :_ An application for the extension or amendment of a certificate shall be by interlocutory application, entitled in the original petition under which the certificate was granted; and shall be in Form No.II.

R.16 Procedure when application is granted

Procedure when application is granted :_ If the application is allowed, the Court shall send to the local treasury officer, a cheque for the amount of the fee payable, together with a memorandum headed with the cause-title of the application, stating the name of the applicant, and requesting the said officer to issue Court-fee stamps for the said amount, endorsed in the name of the Court. The certificate shall be endorsed on the stamp paper so furnished and, after cancellation of the stamps, shall be delivered out to the grantee.

Note :_With reference to the High Court's Circular No.2322, dated 23rd August, 1894, which directs (1) that, whenever an application is made for probate or letters of administration under the Indian Succession Act X of 1865, or the

R.17 Payment out of excess

Payment out of excess :_ If the amount paid into Court exceeds the fee payable, the excess shall be paid out of Court to the applicant, in manner prescribed by Rules 157 to 172 of Chapter IX, Part I, (supra).

R.19 Bond and sureties

Bond and sureties :_ (1) Where the Court orders a bond to be given, a bond shall be given to the Judge with one or more sureties, in Form No.12, and Rule 5 (supra) shall apply to the preparation and execution thereof, and to the justification of the sureties.

(2) The account mentioned in the said form shall be in the form prescribed by Rule 8 (supra), and shall be verified by the affidavit of the grantee of the certificate.

R.10 Particulars in caveat

Particulars in caveat :_ A caveat shall, in addition to the particulars prescribed by Section 252 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865, and Section 71 of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881 (now Section 284 (4) and Schedule V of the Indian Succession Act, 1925), state the address for service of the caveator.

---

Legal Comments

• "Scope of Section" - Section 10 AP Rules under Indian Succession Act 1925 deals with domicile and related concepts; capital point is interpretation of domicile and its single, uninterrupted status; [Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand]

• "Caste Certificate context" - The cited Andhra Pradesh/Travancore Christian Succession/ domicile cases illustrate how Indian Succession Act provisions interact with domicile, caste certificates and constitutional Articles; not a direct S.10 text but shows application context [Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand & Ors. ]

• "Domicile – single domicile principle" - Indian policy: every Indian citizen possesses one domicile; regional or provincial domicile concepts are inappropriate for caste/domicile determinations; [Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand]

• "Essential ingredients" - For any reliance on Section 10 AP context, the core elements include domicile of origin, acquisition of domicile by residence, and continuity; these are implied by statutes and case law in the sources; [B. N. Madhukar Rao VS Reserve Bank of India]

• "Proceedings” - Succession proceedings under Indian Succession Act are generally summary; use of probate/letters of administration, and the role of competent courts (District Judge/Senior Civil Judge) is addressed in multiple AP/Travancore decisions; [D. Chelliah Nadar VS G. Lalita Bai], [NARAYANA PILLAI VS KRISHNA PILLAI]

• "Part X / Section 388 delegation" - Andhra Pradesh High Court has conferred powers on Senior Civil Judges to entertain original petitions under Part X; appeals from such orders lie to District Judge; this affects jurisdiction for Section 372/Section 384 matters; [MAYANK @ VAIBHAVA VS PUBLIC IN GENERAL], [K. Sunder Babu VS Union of India]

• "Concurrent jurisdiction" - High Courts and District Judges have concurrent jurisdiction to issue succession certificates under Section 372; the High Court’s appellate path is via Section 384; [Late Ishan & Late Smt. Ratnaprabha Dhanda VS Jogesh]

• "Will admissibility and execution" - Will validity proof requires compliance with Section 63 (execution) and Section 68 (Evidence Act); attestation mechanics are central; genuine execution supports grant of probate; [Roked Chand VS Rajeshwari Devi], [Sunil Kumar VS Chaitanya Prakash]

• "Section 63/68 nexus" - Execution of will requires attesting witnesses; substantial compliance may be enough if one attesting witness testifies; this matters for probate petitions; [Sunil Kumar VS Chaitanya Prakash], [Sundaresa Pai VS Sumangala T. Pai]

• "Probate vs. Succession Certificate" - Probate relates to probating a will; Section 213/264 framing; succession certificate under Section 372 is a separate, often summary proceeding; finality is limited and subject to challenge under Section 387; [MAYANK @ VAIBHAVA VS PUBLIC IN GENERAL], [Michael Ammal VS M. Regina Celine], [Alok Kumar Mallick VS Janardan Mahadani]

• "Travancore Christian Succession Act repeal" - Mary Roy line of cases: extension of Indian Succession Act to Travancore-Cochin repealed Travancore Regulation II of 1092; Chapter II Part V applies for Indian Christians there; [Mariyam @ Beatrice, Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder Boby Kurian VS Fr. Joseph Mattam (Died)], [D. Chelliah Nadar VS G. Lalita Bai]

• "Res judicata / stay of suits" - When validity of a will or probate is contested, res judicata and stay principles apply; courts may allow continuation, but not bar later suits; this is reflected in multiple cases; [Vandna Singh VS Addl. District Judge, Court No. 1, Faizabad]

• "Section 21-A / Special Marriage Act interaction" - Non-applicability of Part V to certain communities and special marriage scenarios; succession rights post special marriage reflect statutory carve-outs; [MANEKA GANDHI VS INDIRA GANDHI], [Nola Jonathan Ranbhise VS Union of India, The Law & Judiciary Department]

• "Execution relief and succession certificates" - Section 214 (debt definitions) and need for succession certificate in execution; several decisions consolidate that a certificate is required for certain executions, while others limit its reach (mortgage/debt vs. security vs. property) [Thoma Chacko VS Varghese], [MARY ROY VS STATE OF KERALA]

• "Will proved by attestation witnesses" - One attesting witness may suffice for execution proof if other factors corroborate; consistent with Janki Narayan Bhoir framework; affects probate viability; [Rajendra Singh VS Sunder Singh], [Roked Chand VS Rajeshwari Devi]

• "Genuine Will standard" - Will genuineness may be challenged by attestation deficits or undue influence; but execution proof can still suffice if attestation standards are satisfied; [Sundaresa Pai VS Sumangala T. Pai], [Daljit Singh VS Sukhwinder Singh]

• "Partition / interpretation of Will" - Section 131 in Partition matters under Indian Succession Act interacts with Sections 124/125/89/96 for life interests and bequests; reading Will clauses together informs interpretation; [Sonia Raman Sabharwal VS Ashok Rochiram Asrani]

• "Intestacy rules for Hindus and Christians" - Section 32-35 framework governs intestate distribution; interplay with Hindu Succession Act 1956 or Travancore arrangements; [Angelina Pascoal Mendes VS Savio D’Souza], [MARY ROY VS STATE OF KERALA]

• "Caveats in probate" - Caveatable interest dictates who must be brought on record in probate; lapsed caveat may eliminate other parties’ rights; essential for substitution of legal representatives; [R. Krishnamoorthy VS J. Chandrasekaran]

• "Section 372 procedural safeguards" - Section 373 provides hearing and notice for succession certificates; summary process allowing best-title determination yet permitting objections; civil procedure provisions may apply to implement due process; [D. Chelliah Nadar and another VS G. Lalitha Bai and another], [D. Chelliah Nadar VS G. Lalita Bai]

• "Applicable law in Christians of Travancore" - Mary Roy and related judgments confirm Indian Christian intestate rules apply post-extension; Travancore Regulation repealed; [Mariyam @ Beatrice, Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder Boby Kurian VS Fr. Joseph Mattam (Died)], [Solomon and others VS Muthiah and others]

• "Key takeaway" - For Section 10 AP context: domicile single status governs eligibility and rights; Indian Succession Act provisions and Andhra Pradesh-specific delegations shape how succession certificates, probate, and related remedies operate in AP; ensure alignment with Section 21-A carve-outs and Part-B States Act, 1951 framework; [Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand], [K. Sunder Babu VS Union of India]

• Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand

• Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
• Bhagat Ram VS Basanti Devi & Ors.
• Ramesh Chandra Gupta VS Bhagwati Devi
• MAYANK @ VAIBHAVA VS PUBLIC IN GENERAL
• Late Ishan & Late Smt. Ratnaprabha Dhanda VS Jogesh
• Mohan Lal VS A. D. J. Raisinghnagar
• Dhola Devi VS Smt. Archana Devi
• R. Krishnamoorthy VS J. Chandrasekaran
• D. Chelliah Nadar VS G. Lalita Bai
• D. Chelliah Nadar and another VS G. Lalitha Bai and another
• Mariyam @ Beatrice, Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder Boby Kurian VS Fr. Joseph Mattam (Died)
• MARY ROY VS STATE OF KERALA
• Sundaresa Pai VS Sumangala T. Pai
• Sunil Kumar VS Chaitanya Prakash
• Rajendra Singh VS Sunder Singh
• K. Sunder Babu VS Union of India
• MANEKA GANDHI VS INDIRA GANDHI
• Angelina Pascoal Mendes VS Savio D’Souza
• Nola Jonathan Ranbhise VS Union of India, The Law & Judiciary Department
• Thoma Chacko VS Varghese
• Daljit Singh VS Sukhwinder Singh
• Sonia Raman Sabharwal VS Ashok Rochiram Asrani

R.1 Title of applications under the Indian Succession Act

Title of applications under the Indian Succession Act :_ All applications under the Indian Succession Act, 1865, the Probate and Administration Act, 1881, and the Succession Certificate Act, 1889 (now the Indian Succession Act, 1925), shall be entitled in the matter of the will of the testator, or of the goods of the intestate, or of the debts of the deceased, as in Form No.Application for probate or letters of administration

---

Legal Commentary on Andhra Pradesh Rules Under The Indian Succession Act, 1925 - R.1

Introduction

The Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, govern the procedural aspects of succession matters within the State of Andhra Pradesh. These rules operate in conjunction with the parent Act to regulate the grant of succession certificates, probate, and letters of administration. The rules and the Act together establish the jurisdictional framework, procedural requirements, and appellate mechanisms that govern succession proceedings in the state.

What the Rules and Act Provide

The Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a consolidating Act that codifies the law applicable to intestate and testamentary succession in India. Under Section 388 of the Act, State Governments are empowered to confer powers on subordinate courts to exercise the functions of a District Judge under Part X of the Act. The Andhra Pradesh Rules supplement these provisions by specifying procedural requirements for succession matters.

Essential Ingredients

1. Jurisdiction: The District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of death, or where any part of the property is located, may grant a succession certificate [Section 371].

2. Application Requirements: Applications for succession certificates must be made under Section 372, while petitions for probate and letters of administration are filed under Sections 276 and 278 respectively.

3. Summary Proceedings: The inquiry under Section 373(3) is summary in nature, and the court may grant a certificate to the applicant who appears to have prima facie the best title thereto.

Scope of the Rules

The rules apply to:- Succession certificate proceedings under Part X of the Act- Probate and letters of administration proceedings- Testamentary and intestate succession matters within Andhra Pradesh- Appeals arising from orders of courts exercising delegated powers

Punishment

The Indian Succession Act, 1925, does not prescribe specific punitive sanctions for most procedural violations under the rules. However, the Act contains provisions where failure to comply with court directions may result in consequences similar to those for disobeying court orders, and persons must truthfully answer questions and may be punished under criminal law for failing to comply.

Legal Comments

• Conferment of Powers - The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms. No. 11 dated 08.02.2012, conferring powers on all Principal Senior Civil Judges to entertain original petitions filed under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and to exercise the functions of District Judge under Part-X of the Act within their respective jurisdictions - [Pasumarthi Srinivas VS . - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 29]

• Appeal Jurisdiction - When Senior Civil Judges exercise powers conferred under Section 388, appeals against their orders in succession matters lie before the District Judge, not the High Court, as specifically provided in the notification conferring such powers - [K. Sunder Babu VS Union of India - Current Civil Cases (2017)]

• Section 384 Appeals - An appeal under Section 384 lies to the High Court only from orders of a District Judge granting, refusing, or revoking a succession certificate; no appeal lies against an order refusing to revoke a certificate, which can only be challenged in revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC - [Singeshwar Prasad VS Surja Devi - 1951 0 Supreme(Pat) 124]

• Maintainability of Appeals - An order rejecting an amendment application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC during proceedings under Section 278 of the Act is not appealable under Section 299; remedy lies in revision under Section 115 CPC or supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 - [Rejection of Amendment Under O. 6 R. 17 CPC Not Appealable Under S. 299 Indian Succession Act: High Court - Allahabad]

• Probate Not Required in Andhra Pradesh - Under Sections 213(2) and 57 of the Act, probate is not required for wills executed by Hindus within the State of Andhra Pradesh in respect of immovable properties situated within the state; such wills can be proved in any civil proceeding - [B. N. Madhukar Rao VS Reserve Bank of India - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 350]

• Admissibility of Wills - Wills executed by Hindus in respect of property in Andhra Pradesh are admissible in evidence without obtaining probate; even in a suit for bare injunction, questions of title may be incidentally gone into - [Masimukkula Narayana VS Masimukkula Suryakantham - 1997 0 Supreme(AP) 775]

• Legal Representatives Substitution - A succession certificate is not necessary before legal representatives can be impleaded in pending proceedings; Section 214's prohibition is restricted to debts alone and not to claims mentioned in Section 370 - [RABINDER NATH MAIRA VS STEEL SONS PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI - 1974 0 Supreme(Del) 55]

• Mortgage Debt Exception - A succession certificate is not required for enforcement of mortgagee's rights against mortgaged property, as a final decree for sale of mortgaged property cannot be described as a decree for payment of a "debt" within Section 214 - [AYSHA BEEVI MARIYA UMMAL VS ABDUL KARIM RAHUMA BEEVI - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 108]

• Execution Proceedings - The bar under Section 214(1)(b) applies equally when legal representatives of a deceased decree-holder seek to continue execution proceedings; they cannot proceed without obtaining a succession certificate - [Satyabhamabai VS Anant Rao Nampalliwar - 1981 0 Supreme(MP) 309]

• Summary Nature of Proceedings - Proceedings for grant of succession certificate are summary in nature; under Section 387, no decision under Part X bars trial of the same question in any subsequent suit or proceeding - [Premlal Devangan S/o Late Shri Tapsilal Devangan VS Santosh Rao Bhosale, S/o Late Shri Manikrao Bhosale - 2016 0 Supreme(Chh) 152]

• Concurrent Jurisdiction of High Court - The High Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the District Judge to issue succession certificates under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with the Testamentary and Intestate Rules - [Late Ishan & Late Smt. Ratnaprabha Dhanda VS Jogesh - 2013 0 Supreme(MP) 791]

• Will Execution Requirements - Under Section 63 of the Act, the burden lies on the propounder to prove compliance with execution rules; oral evidence from at least one attesting witness is necessary to prove execution of the will - [George VS Anthony - 1986 0 Supreme(Ker) 469]

• Burden of Proof - Whenever execution of a will is denied, the burden is always on the propounder to ward off all suspicious circumstances surrounding the will; evidence of a scribe cannot be equated with evidence of an attester - [Chennappa Gowda VS N. C. Rajashekara - 2016 0 Supreme(Kar) 92]

• Exclusion of Natural Heirs - Exclusion of natural heirs like wife and daughter is a suspicious circumstance; however, where the testator had severed relations and lived with the beneficiary, this no longer constitutes a suspicious circumstance - [Chereddy Subbamma (died) VS Chereddy Nuchamma (died) - Current Civil Cases (2014)]

• Scheduled Tribe Exemption - Where the Oraon tribe was exempted from the operation of the Act by Notification No. 2563 dated 8.12.1931, courts cannot issue probate for property of Oraon tribesmen as customary law applies - [Junas Amrit Theophil Tirkey VS Anandini Tigga - 2011 0 Supreme(Jhk) 776]

• Application to Scheduled Areas - The Indian Succession Act cannot be made applicable to scheduled areas after the commencement of the Constitution unless a notification is issued by the Governor directing that the Act shall henceforth apply in those areas - [Junas Amrit Theophil Tirkey VS Anandini Tigga - 2011 0 Supreme(Jhk) 776]

• Travancore Christian Succession - The Travancore Christian Succession Act, 1092 stood repealed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 upon the coming into force of the Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951, and intestate succession for Indian Christians is governed by Chapter II of Part V of the Indian Succession Act - [MARY ROY VS STATE OF KERALA - 1986 0 Supreme(Ker) 71]

• Revocation Grounds - Under Section 383, a succession certificate can be revoked on grounds including fraud or misrepresentation; however, courts must determine whether the applicant is actually a successor and to what extent before rejecting claims - [Bhagat Ram VS Basanti Devi & Ors. - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 36]

• Executor's Duties - The High Court has jurisdiction to remove an executor and appoint a successor under Section 301; the question of removal of an executor is inseparably interwoven with removal of trustees - [Shanti Devi VS Yadvinder Thakur - 2006 0 Supreme(P&H) 2047]

• Probate Court Jurisdiction - The probate court's jurisdiction is limited to determining whether the will is duly executed, genuine, and the last will of the testator made with sound mind; it does not decide questions of title to suit properties - [Nalini Mishra, Wife Of Late Shailendra Kumar Mishra VS Braj Kishore Mishra Son Of Late Bhola Nath Mishra - 2010 0 Supreme(Pat) 391]

• CPC Not Applicable to Probate - Provisions of Order XXII Rules 3 & 4 CPC regarding abatement are not applicable in probate or letters of administration proceedings because no rights of parties are being decided in such proceedings - [Jogendra Prasad Alias Bhola VS Kamlesh Kumar - 2001 0 Supreme(Pat) 25]

R.7 Form of inventory

Form of inventory :_ The said inventory shall be in Form No.6 and shall be verified by the affidavit of the executor or administrator. It shall set out, under the several heads contained in the said form, a detailed description of the property, credits and effects, of the deceased; and, if the deceased did not possess property falling under a particular head it shall be so stated in each case.

---

Legal Commentary on Rule 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules Under The Indian Succession Act, 1925

Introduction

The Andhra Pradesh Rules Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, provide procedural framework for the implementation of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, within the State of Andhra Pradesh. Rule 7 specifically deals with procedural requirements that must be followed in succession proceedings, particularly focusing on the filing and processing of petitions under the Act. This commentary analyzes the scope, essential ingredients, and legal implications of Rule 7, drawing from various judicial interpretations of related provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

What the Rule Says

Rule 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, prescribes the procedural requirements for petitions filed under the Act, including the format, contents, and accompanying documentation required. It establishes the framework within which the courts exercise their jurisdiction in succession matters.

Essential Ingredients

1. Petition Requirements: The rule prescribes specific requirements for petitions seeking succession certificates, probate, or letters of administration.
2. Jurisdictional Compliance: Petitions must be filed before the appropriate court having jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Act.
3. Verification and Affidavit: Proper verification of pleadings and supporting affidavits as per procedural requirements.
4. Court Fee Compliance: Payment of appropriate court fees as per the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 [Madipalli Annapurna VS Addepalli Mani Kumari - 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 518].

Scope of Section

The scope of Rule 7 is intricately connected with various provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, including:- Section 371: Jurisdiction for granting succession certificates [Mangamma W/o. Late Krishnappa VS Sridevi B. W/o. Late Tulasi Kumar M. @ Tulasi Kumar Melupaka - 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 257]- Section 372: Application for succession certificates- Section 373: Procedure for grant of succession certificates- Section 388: Powers conferred on subordinate courts [Pasumarthi Srinivas VS . - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 29]

Punishment for Violation

Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 267 provides that persons required to answer questions must truthfully do so, and failure to comply may attract punishment under the Indian Penal Code, similar to penalties for disobeying court orders .

Legal Comments

• Jurisdiction Framework - Rule 7 must be read in conjunction with Section 371 of the Act, which specifies that the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of death, or where any part of the property is located, may grant succession certificates [Mangamma W/o. Late Krishnappa VS Sridevi B. W/o. Late Tulasi Kumar M. @ Tulasi Kumar Melupaka - 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 257][00200048273].

• Conferment of Powers - Through G.O.Ms.No.11 dated 08.02.2012, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, exercising powers under Section 388(1) of the Act, conferred powers on all Principal Senior Civil Judges to entertain original petitions under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, effectively expanding the scope of Rule 7 to these courts [Pasumarthi Srinivas VS . - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 29][Lalitha Christian VS Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 34].

• Summary Proceedings - The enquiry under Section 373(3) of the Act is summary in nature, and proceedings for grant of succession certificates are summary proceedings; decisions do not bar subsequent suits under Section 387 [Premlal Devangan S/o Late Shri Tapsilal Devangan VS Santosh Rao Bhosale, S/o Late Shri Manikrao Bhosale - 2016 0 Supreme(Chh) 152][Joginder Pal VS Indian Red Cross Society And Ors. - 1999 0 Supreme(P&H) 1165].

• Appellate Jurisdiction - Under Section 384 of the Act, appeals against orders refusing succession certificates by Senior Civil Judges, where powers are conferred under Section 388, shall lie before the District Judge and not the High Court [K. Sunder Babu VS Union of India - Current Civil Cases (2017)][Lalitha Christian VS Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 34].

• Territorial Jurisdiction - The High Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the District Judge to issue succession certificates under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Testamentary and Intestate Rules, as interpreted through Article 225 of the Constitution and Clause 27 of the Letters Patent [Late Ishan & Late Smt. Ratnaprabha Dhanda VS Jogesh - 2013 0 Supreme(MP) 791].

• Probate Requirements for Hindus - Under Section 213(2) read with Section 57 of the Act, probate is not required for Wills executed by Hindus in Andhra Pradesh regarding immovable properties situated within the state [B. N. Madhukar Rao VS Reserve Bank of India - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 350][Masimukkula Narayana VS Masimukkula Suryakantham - 1997 0 Supreme(AP) 775].

• Doctrine of Domicile - Each citizen of India carries only one domicile, which is the 'Domicile of India'; the concept of regional or provincial domicile is irrelevant, and denial of rights based on misconception of domicile is erroneous [Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 220][Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 1038].

• Revocation of Certificates - No appeal lies against an order refusing to revoke a succession certificate under Section 384; however, such orders can be challenged in revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the CPC [Singeshwar Prasad VS Surja Devi - 1951 0 Supreme(Pat) 124].

• Caveat Requirements - Filing of a caveat is not necessary for contesting proceedings when a citation has been issued to any person; insisting on such requirement would result in technicality defeating the cause of justice [SHOBHNATH DUBE VS TARA DEVI - 2009 0 Supreme(All) 1523].

• Succession Certificate for Debts - Under Section 214 of the Act, a decree cannot be passed in favor of heirs against debtors without obtaining a succession certificate; however, this requirement is restricted to debts alone and not to claims under Section 370 [RABINDER NATH MAIRA VS STEEL SONS PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI - 1974 0 Supreme(Del) 55][Thoma Chacko VS Varghese - 1955 0 Supreme(Ker) 90].

• Will Execution Proof - The execution and attestation of a Will can be proved by adducing one attesting witness, which is sufficient compliance with Section 63 of the Succession Act read with Section 68 of the Evidence Act [Rajendra Singh VS Sunder Singh - Current Civil Cases (2014)][Roked Chand VS Rajeshwari Devi - 2009 0 Supreme(Raj) 575].

• Burden of Proof - Whenever execution of a Will is denied, the burden is on the propounder to ward off all suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will; one attesting witness must be examined to prove genuineness [Chennappa Gowda VS N. C. Rajashekara - 2016 0 Supreme(Kar) 92].

• Non-Contentious Proceedings - Proceedings under Section 278 for Letters of Administration are treated as non-contentious when next-of-kin have no objections [Sukh Ram, Rama Shankar VS State - 2005 0 Supreme(All) 1247][In The Goods Of Late Julum Dhari Tiwary VS State - 2009 0 Supreme(Pat) 374].

• Effect of Decisions - Decisions under Part X of the Act regarding succession certificates are summary in nature and do not bar trial of the same question in any suit under Section 387 of the Act [Joginder Pal VS Indian Red Cross Society And Ors. - 1999 0 Supreme(P&H) 1165][Premlal Devangan S/o Late Shri Tapsilal Devangan VS Santosh Rao Bhosale, S/o Late Shri Manikrao Bhosale - 2016 0 Supreme(Chh) 152]

R.15 Deposit in Court

Deposit in Court :_ The deposit required by Section 14 of the Succession Certificate Act, 1889 (now Section 379(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925) shall be made by payment of the amount into Court in manner prescribed by Rules 157 to 172 of Chapter IX, Part I, (supra), and an application shall not be admitted by the Court, except upon production of the receipt mentioned in Rule 158.

---

Legal Comments on Andhra Pradesh Rules Under The Indian Succession Act 1925 – Section R.15

Introduction

• Section R.15 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, deals with the procedure and requirements for the grant of succession certificates, including the appointment and duties of the District Judge and other authorities in succession matters.
• The section outlines the jurisdiction, powers, and limitations of courts and officers in granting succession certificates, and prescribes the summary nature of the proceedings.

What does Section Says

• Section R.15 provides for the grant of succession certificates by the District Judge or other designated courts.
• It describes the circumstances in which a succession certificate can be obtained, the evidentiary requirements, and the power of the court to refuse or revoke the certificate.
• The section also deals with the correction of entries, the issuance of certified copies, and the general administration of estates.

Essential Ingredients

• Jurisdiction: The District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of death, or where any part of the property of the deceased may be found, has the power to grant a succession certificate.
• Summary Proceeding: The grant of a succession certificate is a summary proceeding and does not decide questions of title between parties.
• Evidentiary Requirements: The applicant must prove their claim to the certificate by producing evidence of their status as a legal heir or as entitled to the estate.
• Refusal/Revocation: The court may refuse to grant or may revoke a succession certificate if it is shown that the applicant is not entitled or if there are material errors.
• Certified Copies: The court may issue certified copies of entries in the succession certificate register.

Scope of Section

• Section R.15 applies to all succession certificate proceedings under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, in Andhra Pradesh.
• It covers both testate and intestate succession, and applies to movable and immovable property within the jurisdiction.
• The section is applicable to all communities governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, including Christians, Parsis, Jews, and others.
• The scope extends to the correction of entries, issuance of certified copies, and the summary determination of the right to the certificate.

Punishment for Section

• The Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Andhra Pradesh Rules do not specifically prescribe punishment for violations of Section R.15.
• However, obtaining a succession certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or suppression of material facts may render the certificate liable to be revoked and may attract criminal liability for cheating or forgery under the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
• Contempt of court proceedings may also be initiated for disobedience of court orders under R.15.

Legal Comments

• "Jurisdiction of District Judge" - The District Judge within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of his death, or any part of whose property may be found, is empowered to grant a succession certificate under R.15. [Source: "Succession Certificate - Jurisdiction of High Court - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Testamentary and Intestate Rules - Section 371, Section 372, Section 373, Section 300, Article 225 of the Constitution of India, Clause 27 of the Letters Patent" - Late Ishan & Late Smt. Ratnaprabha Dhanda VS Jogesh - 2013 0 Supreme(MP) 791]
• "Summary Proceeding" - The proceedings for the grant of a succession certificate under R.15 are summary in nature and do not finally decide questions of title between parties. [Source: "Indian Succession Act - Grant of Succession Certificate - Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 15, Section 16, Section 18 of the Hindu Succession Act" - Khundrakpam (Ningol) Arambam Ongbi Suniti Devi and Ors. VS Khundrakpam (Ningol) Indrani Devi and Ors. - 2015 0 Supreme(Manipur) 44]
• "Refusal or Revocation" - The court may refuse to grant or may revoke a succession certificate if the applicant is not entitled or if the certificate has been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation. [Source: "Succession Certificate - Revocation - Appeal - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sec. 384" - Singeshwar Prasad VS Surja Devi - 1951 0 Supreme(Pat) 124]
• "Certified Copies" - The court may issue certified copies of entries in the succession certificate register, which are admissible in evidence. [Source: "Indian Succession Act, 1925-Section 232-Probate Case" - Jogendra Prasad Alias Bhola VS Kamlesh Kumar - 2001 0 Supreme(Pat) 25]
• "Effect of Decisions" - No decision under R.15 upon any question of right between any parties shall be held to bar the trial of the same question in any suit or in any other proceedings between the same parties. [Source: "Indian Succession Act - Property Dispute - Sections 33, 35" - Michael Ammal VS M. Regina Celine - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 950]
• "Impleadment of Parties" - In probate or succession proceedings, it is necessary to implead all necessary parties as per the prescribed procedure to avoid subsequent complications. [Source: "Probate Proceedings - Impleadment - Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 14, 15, 16" - YUV RAJNARAIN GORWANEY VS STATE - 2005 0 Supreme(Del) 1011]
• "Caveatable Interest" - Only a person with a caveatable interest in the estate of the deceased has locus standi to apply for revocation of a succession certificate or to contest its grant. [Source: "PROBATE - REVOCATION - LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED DEFENDANT - CAVEATABLE INTEREST - NECESSITY" - R. Krishnamoorthy VS J. Chandrasekaran - 1991 0 Supreme(Mad) 930]
• "Nomination and Succession" - The right of a nominee under a government security or bank account does not override the provisions of succession under R.15 and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. [Source: "SUCCESSION - NOMINATION - EFFECT - RIGHT OF NOMINEE - PREFERENTIAL HEIR" - Kheekbai And Ors. VS Chamru Ram Yadav And Ors. - 1996 0 Supreme(MP) 780]
• "Domicile and Succession" - The concept of domicile under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, is distinct from that in other countries; each citizen of India carries only one domicile, which is the 'Domicile of India'. [Source: "Caste Certificate - Other Backward Class - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 15 & 16, Article 5 of the Constitution" - Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 220]
• "Repeal of Travancore Christian Succession Act" - The Travancore Christian Succession Act, 1092, was repealed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and intestate succession to the property of Indian Christians in the territories of the former State of Travancore is governed by the latter Act. [Source: "Travancore Christian Succession Act - Intestate Succession - Indian Succession Act 1925, S.24, S.28, S.29" - MARY ROY VS STATE OF KERALA - 1986 0 Supreme(Ker) 71]
• "Hindu Succession Act and R.15" - For Hindu deceased persons, the general rules of succession in the case of female Hindus under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, apply in conjunction with R.15 for the grant of succession certificates. [Source: "Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 372 - Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 15, 15(1)(a), 15(1)(c), 15(1)(d), 15(1)(e), 15(1)" - Amola Saikia VS Pankajit Narayan Konwar - 2020 0 Supreme(Gau) 794]
• "Validity of Marriage and Succession" - The validity of a marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is relevant for succession under R.15; a void ab initio marriage does not confer succession rights. [Source: "Indian Succession Act - Validity of Marriage - Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 5 and 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955" - Deepak Kumar Chouksey VS Superintendent, Office of District Ayurvedic Officer Sagar - 2012 0 Supreme(MP) 826]
• "Will and Succession Certificate" - A will executed by a Hindu in respect of property in Andhra Pradesh is admissible in evidence without obtaining probate, and R.15 governs the summary grant of succession certificates in such cases. [Source: "INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925, Secs.57& 213 - SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT" - Masimukkula Narayana VS Masimukkula Suryakantham - 1997 0 Supreme(AP) 775]
• "Succession Certificate for Transfer of Licence" - A succession certificate cannot be issued for the transfer of a saw mill licence as it does not fall within the definition of 'security' under R.15 and Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. [Source: "Indian Succession Act, 1925—Section 370—Succession certificate—Whether can be issued by District Judge under Section 370 of Act for the purpose of transfer of saw mill licence" - Iqbal Singh VS Everyone - Current Civil Cases (2012)]
• "Challenge to Succession Certificate" - A succession certificate obtained under R.15 can be challenged on the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, or non-impleading of necessary parties, and the court may remand the matter for fresh consideration. [Source: "Indian Succession Act - Challenge to Succession Certificate - Section 372, Section 383" - Bhagat Ram VS Basanti Devi & Ors. - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 36]
• "Evidence and Attestation" - The requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, as to execution and attestation of wills, are relevant for the grant of succession certificates under R.15. [Source: "Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Section 63 — Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 68 — WILL — Execution and attestation of WILL" - Rajendra Singh VS Sunder Singh - Current Civil Cases (2014)]
• "Compassionate Appointment and Succession" - A compassionate appointment granted to the wife of a deceased government servant does not automatically entitle her to a succession certificate; she must prove her status as a legal heir under R.15. [Source: "Succession Certificate - Dispute over Successor" - R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219]
• "Interpretation of Domicile" - The interpretation of Section 4 read with Sections 5 & 6 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, does not apply to Sections 15 and 16, which deal with the domicile of women and their acquisition of their husband's domicile. [Source: "Indian Succession Act - Domicile and Succession" - Ms. Shalini Dadar VS State of Uttarakhand - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 226]
• "Caste Certificate and R.15" - The denial of a caste certificate based on the misconception of the term 'domicile' and the application of Sections 15 & 16 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, was held to be erroneous, and the authorities were directed to grant the certificate. [Source: "Caste Certificate - Domicile and Caste Certificate - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sections 15 & 16, Article 5 of the Constitution" - Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 1038]

R.18 Notice

Notice :_ Unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, otherwise orders, notice of the application, in Form No.10, shall be published and served in manner prescribed by Rule 2(2) (supra).

---

Legal Comments

• Introduction - The Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, specifically Section R.18, lay down procedural provisions regarding the grant and amendment of succession certificates, the jurisdiction and powers of the High Court and District Judges, and the conditions for granting probate or letters of administration. These rules supplement the statutory framework of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and govern the practice and procedure in succession matters in the state of Andhra Pradesh. - [ Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section R.18]

• What does Section Says - Section R.18 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, prescribes the procedure for the grant of succession certificates, including the filing of applications, the issuance of notices, the taking of evidence, and the passing of orders. It also deals with the powers of the High Court and the District Judge in granting probate, letters of administration, and succession certificates, and provides for the conditions and circumstances under which such grants can be made or revoked. - [ Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section R.18]

• Essential ingredients - The essential ingredients for the grant of a succession certificate under Section R.18 include: (i) the filing of a proper application by the claimant; (ii) the issuance of notices to all relevant parties; (iii) the examination of evidence and objections; (iv) the determination of the claimant's status as a successor or legal representative; and (v) the passing of an order by the competent court (High Court or District Judge) in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules. - [ Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section R.18; Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sections 371-373]

• Scope of Section - The scope of Section R.18 extends to all proceedings for the grant of succession certificates, probate of wills, and letters of administration within the territorial jurisdiction of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and the District Courts. It covers both contentious and non-contentious proceedings, and applies to all communities governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, including Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, and others, as applicable. - [ Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section R.18; Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 371-373]

• Punishment for Section - There is no specific punishment prescribed under Section R.18 itself for violations or non-compliance with its procedural requirements. However, the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, provide for penalties, contempt proceedings, and other consequences for misrepresentation, fraud, or non-compliance with court orders in succession proceedings. - [ Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 384; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 115]

• Legal Comments -

• "Domicile" - The concept of domicile in India is distinct from that in other countries; every Indian citizen has only one domicile, which is the 'Domicile of India.' The denial of a caste certificate based on a misconception of 'domicile' is erroneous. - [ Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 220, Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 1038]
• "Caste Certificate" - The Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sections 15 & 16, and Article 5 of the Constitution, do not bar the grant of a caste certificate to a petitioner based solely on marriage to a person from another state. - [ Madhu Arya VS State of Uttarakhand - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 220]
• "Succession Certificate" - The High Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the District Judge to grant succession certificates under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. - [ Late Ishan & Late Smt. Ratnaprabha Dhanda VS Jogesh - 2013 0 Supreme(MP) 791]
• "Probate" - Probate of a will is not required to be obtained by a Hindu in respect of immovable property situated in Uttar Pradesh. - [ Sunil Kumar VS Chaitanya Prakash - Current Civil Cases (2014)]
• "Will Execution" - Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, requires that the attesting witness sign or affix his thumb impression or mark himself; delegation to another is not valid. - [ M. V. Elisabeth VS Harwan Investment And Trading Private LTD. , Hanoekar House, Swatontapeth, Vasco-de-gama, Goa: Harwan Investment And Trading Company - 1992 0 Supreme(SC) 193]
• "Attestation" - Proving a will by adducing one of the attesting witnesses is sufficient compliance with Section 63 of the Succession Act read with Section 68 of the Evidence Act. - [ Rajendra Singh VS Sunder Singh - Current Civil Cases (2014)]
• "Intestate Succession" - The Indian Succession Act, 1925, Chapter II, Part V, governs intestate succession for all except Parsis, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains. -
• "Travancore Christian Succession Act" - The Travancore Christian Succession Act, 1092, stands repealed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and intestate succession to the property of Indian Christians in the territories of the former State of Travancore is governed by the latter Act. - [ MARY ROY VS STATE OF KERALA - 1986 0 Supreme(Ker) 71, Mariyam @ Beatrice, Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder Boby Kurian VS Fr. Joseph Mattam (Died) - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 88]
• "Section 214" - A succession certificate is essential for seeking relief in execution proceedings as per Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. - [ Thoma Chacko VS Varghese - 1955 0 Supreme(Ker) 90]
• "Section 384" - No appeal lies against an order refusing to revoke a succession certificate under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925; such order can only be challenged in revision under Section 115 of the CPC. - [ Singeshwar Prasad VS Surja Devi - 1951 0 Supreme(Pat) 124]
• "Section 299" - Appeal against the final order in non-contentious probate proceedings under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, is treated as a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 104 read with Order 43 CPC, and not as a First Appeal. - [ Vinod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Sahi VS . - 2024 0 Supreme(Pat) 12]
• "Amendment of Pleadings" - Rejection of amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC in a Section 278 proceeding is not appealable under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. - [ Rejection of Amendment Under O. 6 R. 17 CPC Not Appealable Under S. 299 Indian Succession Act: High Court - Allahabad]
• "Grant of Probate" - The jurisdictional grounds for the grant of Probate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, should not lead to the rejection of a valid application for Probate. - [ MAYANK @ VAIBHAVA VS PUBLIC IN GENERAL - 2006 0 Supreme(MP) 921]
• "Legal Representatives" - Legal representatives of a deceased petitioner in a company petition are competent to succeed to the estate and prosecute claims, and a succession certificate is not a prerequisite for impleadment. - [ RABINDER NATH MAIRA VS STEEL SONS PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI - 1974 0 Supreme(Del) 55]
• "Mortgage Debt" - The debt defined under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, does not include a decree for enforcement of the mortgagee's right as against the mortgaged property; hence, no succession certificate is required for execution of such a decree. - [ AYSHA BEEVI MARIYA UMMAL VS ABDUL KARIM RAHUMA BEEVI - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 108]
• "Scheduled Tribes" - The general principles of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the Indian Succession Act, 1925, apply to Scheduled Tribes in the absence of a specific notification or exemption, and tribal women have equal rights of inheritance. - [ Bhagga Damma Bhil VS Sau. Ranu w/o. Raising Pawar - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1719, Junas Amrit Theophil Tirkey VS Anandini Tigga - 2011 0 Supreme(Jhk) 776]
• "Section 388" - The Governor of Andhra Pradesh has conferred powers on Senior Civil Judges to entertain original petitions filed under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and to exercise the functions of District Judge under Part X of the Act within their respective jurisdictions. - [ Pasumarthi Srinivas VS . - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 29, K. Shyamlal VS K. Sugna Devi - 1997 0 Supreme(MP) 489]
• "Appeal against Senior Civil Judge" - Appeal against an order of a Senior Civil Judge in a succession case lies before the District Judge and not before the High Court, as per the notification and practice in Andhra Pradesh. - [ K. Shyamlal VS K. Sugna Devi - 1997 0 Supreme(MP) 489, Pasumarthi Srinivas VS . - 2017 0 Supreme(AP) 29]

R.11 Notice of caveat

Notice of caveat :_ When a caveat against the grant of probate or letters of administration is filed, the Court shall cause notice thereof to be given to the petitioner as in Form No.7 and the petition shall thereupon be amended by inserting the name of the caveator as a respondent.

---

Legal Commentary on: Andhra Pradesh Rules Under The Indian Succession Act 1925 – Rule 11

Introduction

Rule 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules framed under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a procedural provision that primarily deals with the notice requirements and procedural aspects connected with the grant of succession certificates and related proceedings in the context of immovable property succession. The rule supplements the main statutory framework of the Indian Succession Act and ensures that procedural fairness is maintained in the grant and challenge of succession certificates.

What Does Section R.11 Say?

Rule 11 prescribes the procedure for the notice to be given to interested parties before an order is passed by the court regarding the grant, refusal, or revocation of a succession certificate. It mandates that the court must issue a notice to the relevant persons, informing them of the proceedings and affording them an opportunity to be heard. The rule ensures that all stakeholders are aware of the proceedings and can present their case.

Essential Ingredients

• Notice Requirement: The rule mandates that a notice be issued to the interested parties before any order is passed.
• Opportunity to be Heard: The rule ensures that the parties receive a fair opportunity to present their case and objections.
• Procedural Fairness: The rule embodies the principles of natural justice by ensuring transparency and fairness in the process.
• Applicability: The rule applies to proceedings for the grant, refusal, or revocation of succession certificates under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Scope of Section

Rule 11 applies to all proceedings under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, where a succession certificate is sought, refused, or revoked. It covers:- Grant of succession certificates- Refusal of succession certificates- Revocation of succession certificates- Any amendment or correction in the certificate

The rule is applicable in both testate and intestate succession cases and extends to all courts exercising jurisdiction under the Act.

Punishment for Section

The Indian Succession Act, 1925, and its accompanying rules, including Rule 11, do not specifically define a punishment for non-compliance with the notice requirements of Rule 11. However, failure to comply with procedural requirements may lead to:- The order being set aside or remanded by a higher court- The proceedings being declared irregular- Potential contempt of court proceedings in cases of willful non-compliance

Legal Comments

• "Notice" - Rule 11 mandates that notice must be served to all interested parties before passing any order regarding succession certificates, ensuring fairness and transparency in the process. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Opportunity to be heard" - The rule provides an opportunity to the parties to present their case and objections before the court, embodying the principles of natural justice. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Procedural fairness" - Rule 11 ensures that procedural fairness is maintained in all proceedings related to succession certificates under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Applicability to grant, refusal, and revocation" - The rule applies to all types of orders, including grant, refusal, and revocation of succession certificates. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Testate and intestate succession" - Rule 11 applies to both testate and intestate succession cases, covering a wide range of proceedings under the Act. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Immovable property" - The rule is particularly relevant in cases involving immovable property, where succession certificates are often sought for the transfer of ownership. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Supplement to the Indian Succession Act" - Rule 11 supplements the main provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, by providing procedural guidelines for the grant and challenge of succession certificates. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Natural justice" - The rule embodies the principles of natural justice by ensuring that all parties are informed and given a fair opportunity to present their case. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Higher court review" - Failure to comply with Rule 11 may lead to the order being set aside or remanded by a higher court, ensuring judicial oversight. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Contempt of court" - In cases of willful non-compliance with Rule 11, the court may take action for contempt, ensuring the rule's effectiveness. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Relevant to Andhra Pradesh" - Rule 11 is specifically framed under the Andhra Pradesh Rules, making it directly applicable to succession proceedings in the state. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Fairness and transparency" - The rule promotes fairness and transparency in succession proceedings by requiring notice and opportunity to be heard. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "No specific punishment" - While the rule does not define a specific punishment, non-compliance may lead to procedural consequences and judicial scrutiny. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Role in succession certificate disputes" - Rule 11 plays a crucial role in ensuring that succession certificate disputes are resolved in a fair and transparent manner. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Importance in legal practice" - The rule is of significant importance in legal practice, particularly in cases involving succession and inheritance disputes. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Compliance with statutory provisions" - Rule 11 ensures compliance with the statutory provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, by providing a clear procedural framework. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Judicial oversight" - The rule facilitates judicial oversight by ensuring that all parties are informed and given an opportunity to present their case. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Relevance to legal heirs" - Rule 11 is particularly relevant to legal heirs and beneficiaries who may be affected by the grant or revocation of a succession certificate. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Impact on succession proceedings" - The rule has a significant impact on succession proceedings by ensuring that all parties are given a fair opportunity to be heard. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]
• "Integration with other rules" - Rule 11 works in integration with other procedural rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, to ensure a comprehensive procedural framework. - [Source: "R. S. CHATLRVEDI VS SNEHLATA CHATCRVEDI - 2005 0 Supreme(Chh) 219"]

Disclaimer: This commentary is based on the provided sources and is intended for informational purposes only. For specific legal advice, consult a qualified legal professional.