HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
A. S. CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN, JJ
JANABAI RAMCHANDRA BHONDWE AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
HARI LAXMAN RAKSHE AND ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over inheritance rights (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. submissions by counsel (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. examination of relevant laws (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's ruling on inheritance rights (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. conclusion on daughter's rights (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT : ( Per Jitendra Jain, J. )
1. In Second Appeal No.593 of 1987, the following substantial question of law arose for consideration :
“Whether a daughter could acquire any right, either limited or absolute, by inheritance prior to coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in the property of her deceased father, who died prior to 1956, leaving behind him in addition to such daughter, his widow as well?”
2. The facts giving rise to the aforesaid substantial question of law are that one Yeshwantrao had two wives, Laxmibai and Bhikubai – Yeshwantrao had two daughters from Laxmibai, namely Sonubai and Radhabai. From his marriage with Bhikubai, he had a daughter, Champubai. Laxmibai pre-deceased her husband in 1930. Sonubai expired in 1949 while Yeshwantrao expired on 10th June 1952. Bhikubai expired on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.