Followed / Cited Favorably:

Several references, such as in Hinchharam VS Shyama Bai, Widow Of Late Guharam. - 2020 0 Supreme(Chh) 312, D. T. Rajkapoor Sah @ Raghul Sah (Died) VS Kamakshi Bai - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3810, D. T. Rajkapoor Sah @ Raghul Sah (Died) VS Kamakshi Bai - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3794, Vasumathi VS R. Vasudevan - Madras (2024), and Chanderpal VS Prem Singh - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1925, mention that the Supreme Court has followed or relied upon the principles laid down in Arshnoor Singh or other cases, indicating these cases are considered good law and are being cited as authoritative.

Cases like Sheela VS Amartya - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2290, Raja Pushpa Properties Pvt. Ltd. VS B. Venkatamma - 2020 0 Supreme(Telangana) 57, Raja Pushpa Properties Pvt Ltd VS B. Venkatamma - 2020 0 Supreme(Telangana) 245, Kisto Sahu VS Fulmani Devi - 2022 0 Supreme(Jhk) 97, and Minor Saumya Pradipkumar Patel Through Hareshkumar Keshavlal Patel VS Shrimad Construction - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 609 indicate that the judgments or principles from Arshnoor Singh have been followed or referenced in subsequent judgments, supporting their continued judicial acceptance.

The case SRI SANN KATAPPA @ BHEEMAPPA vs SMT ERAMMA WIFE OF SANNA KATAPPA @ BHEEMAPPA - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 18313 explicitly states that the Supreme Court reported in Arshnoor Singh confirms certain legal principles, reinforcing its standing as good law.

Distinguished / Clarified:

Cases such as Sri S.J.A.Nadeem vs Sri D.Madhava Rao - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 44086, J. SANTHAKUMARI vs MOHANAN - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32082, J SANTHAKUMARI vs MOHANAN - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43979, and Vasumathi VS R. Vasudevan - Current Civil Cases (2024) discuss specific legal principles, such as inheritance, coparcenary property, and succession, citing Arshnoor Singh but also clarifying or distinguishing certain aspects (e.g., the effect of partition, the status of inherited property). These references suggest that Arshnoor Singh has been used as a precedent but with clarifications, not overruled.

JANABAI RAMCHANDRA BHONDWE AND ANR. vs HARI LAXMAN RAKSHE AND ORS. - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6661 and Radhabai Balasaheb Shirke, since deceased, through her heirs & L. Rs. VS Keshav Ramchandra Jadhav - Current Civil Cases (2024) mention that the principles from Arshnoor Singh are consistent with other judgments and are being relied upon accordingly.

Uncertain / Ambiguous Treatment:

Multiple references to Arshnoor Singh, such as in S. Sampoornam VS C. K. Shanmugam - Current Civil Cases (2022), Alamelu VS Palanisamy Gounder (Died) - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 1956, Lakshman Reddy, S/o. Late Govinda Reddy VS G. Danamma, W/o. Jayaramreddy - 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 613, K.S.V. Nataraja Nadar (Died) N. Parthasarathy vs Tmt. Durga - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2647, and Nischal Ramkumar represented by his Power of Attorney Agent, K.Kamalanathan vs Ramesh Babu - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55058, indicate reliance or citation but do not specify whether the case has been followed, distinguished, or criticized. Without explicit language about treatment, the treatment remains uncertain.

Some references, like in Ajay Kumar Garg VS Avyaay Anirudh Garg - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 2000, mention the case in passing or as part of a broader discussion without clear indication of judicial treatment.

The repeated mention of the case in various contexts suggests it is still relevant, but the nature of its treatment (affirmative, clarificatory, or otherwise) is not explicitly stated.

Other notes:

Several references, such as Uttam VS Saubhag Singh - 2016 2 Supreme 345, SHYAM NARAYAN PRASAD VS KRISHNA PRASAD - 2018 6 Supreme 476, and J Santhakumari, (Died) (Legal Heirs Recorded) Kunnuvilakathu Veedu VS Mohanan - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1022, discuss legal principles related to inheritance and partition, citing Arshnoor Singh, but do not specify whether these are affirmations or modifications of the case's principles.