HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIKANT DATTATRAY KULKARNI
PRADIP KUNDLIKRAO KUTE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.924 OF 2022 Pradip Kundlikrao Kute Age : 29 Years, Occu: Agriculture, R/o: Salna, Taluka – Aundha Nagnath, District – Hingoli ...Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Aundha Nagnath Police Station, Aundha Nagnath, Dist. Hingoli.
2. Madhav S/o Sopanrao Darade, Age : 31 years, Occu. Agriculture, R/o. Salna, Taluka – Aundha Nagnath, District-Hingoli.
3. Sopan S/o. Sakharam Darade, Age : 75 years, Occu. Agriculture, R/o. As above.
4. Vitthal Ganesh Darade, Age : 24 years, Occu. Agriculture, R/o. As above.
5. Uddhav S/o Sopan Darade, Age : 41 years, Occu. Agriculture, R/o. As above.
6. Ganesh S/o Sopan Darade, Age : 50 years, Occu. Driver, R/o. As above. ...Respondents Mr Swapnil S. Rathi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr P.G. Borade, APP for the Respondent No.1/State Mr Dhananjay M. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of both the sides at admission stage.
2. The petitioner has challenged the order passed below Exh.109 in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.